Sunday , February 23 2020
Home / V. Ramanan: Concerted Action / Thomas Piketty On Globalisation And Borders

Thomas Piketty On Globalisation And Borders

Summary:
Thomas Piketty has an interesting observation on globalisation and migration/borders.From slide 11 from a lecture from July (and in earlier talks too):Why is rising inequality not leading to rising demand for redistribution?One possible explanation: globalisation & competitition between countries make vertical redistribution more difficult to organize.I.e. if the only thing the modern nation-state can do is to control borders, then unsurprisingly the political conflict will be entirely about border controls and immigration.→ end of class-based redistributive politics, rise of identity-based conflictCertainly part of the explanation, but not enough: too mechanical.Nothing in globalization makes redistribution technically impossible.Globalisation—under the current rules of the game—puts a

Topics:
V. Ramanan considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Dan Crawford writes Open thread Feb. 21, 2020

Lars Syll writes We need a ‘Fridays for Keynesianism’ movement!

Eric Kramer writes How to roast the planet with good intentions: The Climate Equity Act

Editor writes Wealth has always been about power

Thomas Piketty has an interesting observation on globalisation and migration/borders.

From slide 11 from a lecture from July (and in earlier talks too):

  • Why is rising inequality not leading to rising demand for redistribution?
  • One possible explanation: globalisation & competitition between countries make vertical redistribution more difficult to organize.
    I.e. if the only thing the modern nation-state can do is to control borders, then unsurprisingly the political conflict will be entirely about border controls and immigration.
    → end of class-based redistributive politics, rise of identity-based conflict
  • Certainly part of the explanation, but not enough: too mechanical.
    Nothing in globalization makes redistribution technically impossible.

Globalisation—under the current rules of the game—puts a constraint on the expansion of economies. So Piketty thinks that this can explain the debate around migration since the last few years. Although he doesn’t say that, I’d imagine that he is saying that the distribution of income favouring lower classes is difficult because of the race to the bottom caused by globalisation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *