The “Independent” External Review Panel on The Evergreen State College Response to the Spring 2017 Campus Events (quotes not in the original) just released its report, and it says that everything campus administration has done in connection with this episode and everything it is now doing in response to it is beyond reproach. It repeats the arguments of the college’s “equity” faction (again my quotes—it has little to do with equity) in the faction’s own language and omits any information that might undermine their point of view. Of course, it was impaneled by the college’s president and interviewed only a few authorized informants (listed in the report), so we shouldn’t be too surprised. If anyone on campus thinks it offers independent support for the “equitarian” perspective on the
Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice
Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.
That’s the short version, which is probably all—maybe more than all—most readers of this blog care about. The long version would require a report of its own, and I won’t bother with that. It isn’t worth it; outside the Evergreen bubble no one will take this seriously.
Still, there’s a reason to spend another few minutes with it because, in its perverse way, the report will ultimately solidify the standard narrative about a campus gone wild with violent ultra-leftism. This is because, by avoiding all the uncomfortable questions, it leaves their answers to right wing idealogues.
What the report does say:
The disruptions on campus reflected national and local political trends concerning opposition to racial injustice.
They were handled in an ideal fashion by the college.
Those videos-that-went-viral misrepresented what happened.
Bret Weinstein “took advantage” of the protests to promulgate his views in right wing media.
Nevertheless, the bad publicity, stoked by misinformation, has had a large negative effect on college enrollments.
Going forward, we should further embrace the initiatives already underway at the college:
support the Equity Plan
mandatory diversity training
hire more staff in diversity support
reform the curriculum to make it more “student-ready”, with clearer goals and standards
improve campus communications
provide an equity justification for every faculty position and hiring decision
require faculty statements on diversity in all course syllabi (not yet underway as far as I know)
And here are some of the things not mentioned by the report:
1. The videos were sadly quite accurate, since they were largely posted by the activists themselves, who were initially proud of what they did.
2. Nothing was mentioned about vigilante activity at the college, which might cast the “calm” response of certain administrators in a different light.
3. There were no ongoing student organizations involved in the protest. Leaders emerged solely by virtue of charisma and were not accountable to any democratic process whatever. Few political demands were made, and the main point was to vent. (The video of the protest at the inauguration of Purce Hall is a gem in this respect.)
4. There is *no* Equity Plan to be implemented. A document by that name was presented at the “canoe event” of November, 2016—another great video—but it was pasted together in a couple of hours, never proofread, and largely consists of language taken verbatim from nationally distributed diversity manuals.
5. Even though it is open admission, the college lacks both a developmental curriculum and the resources to genuinely support students from academically disadvantaged backgrounds in the “normal” curriculum (insofar as any curriculum at Evergreen is normal). There *is* an initiative to rectify this in the area of math and quantitative literacy, but it hasn’t been funded yet and was not mentioned in this report. A committee charged to develop a parallel proposal in writing (which included prominent “equity warriors”) chose not to develop one.
And there’s much, much more, but I have to stop.
This whole business has been terrible. I think Evergreen is a national, even an international treasure. It is not perfect, but it has followed its own path for decades and has made large contributions to our understanding of how college-level learning can take place. There are lots of brilliant, hyper-dedicated people working there. It does indeed suffer from serious equity gaps, partly because the entire country suffers from them and passes them along with each cohort of students we take, and partly from real neglect on our part. It also suffers from the pseudo-politics of the callout culture and its ritual symbolism, also a fixture of politics everywhere. It has lots of potential, but it needs a moment of honest communication with the outside world or it may just get crushed.