Summary:
Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment: “No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.” Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should
Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment:Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment: “No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.” Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should
Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Jeremy Smith writes UK workers’ pay over 6 years – just about keeping up with inflation (but one sector does much better…)
Robert Vienneau writes The Emergence of Triple Switching and the Rarity of Reswitching Explained
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Schuldenbremse bye bye
Robert Skidelsky writes Lord Skidelsky to ask His Majesty’s Government what is their policy with regard to the Ukraine war following the new policy of the government of the United States of America.
“No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.”Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should be unconstitutional as well. Nor should the federal government be encumbered in its choice of appropriate fiscal policy. The historical record shows policy errors have been made in all directions; there is no reasonable basis for biasing policy away from one set of mistakes only to bias it toward another.
A parallel agreement to replace the EU’s (In)Stability and (De)Growth Pact would also be desirable.