Summary:
Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment: “No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.” Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should
Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment:Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment: “No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.” Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should
Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice
Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.
“No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues. The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits. Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.”Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional. Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should be unconstitutional as well. Nor should the federal government be encumbered in its choice of appropriate fiscal policy. The historical record shows policy errors have been made in all directions; there is no reasonable basis for biasing policy away from one set of mistakes only to bias it toward another.
A parallel agreement to replace the EU’s (In)Stability and (De)Growth Pact would also be desirable.