Saturday , July 4 2020
Home / EconoSpeak / A Compromise on Liability

A Compromise on Liability

Summary:
So Mitch McConnell and the senate Republicans want blanket employer liability protection as the price of another round of economic support.  They have this leverage because Democrats kept postponing their agenda until they were the only ones with a list of things they wanted to spend money on.(This illustrates classic bargaining theory to a T.  Bargaining power depends on how much you think you will lose if the agreement is delayed [Rubinstein] or fails completely.  Democrats feared economic damage to the public if bailout bills weren’t approved immediately.  Once the financial markets were backstopped Republicans considered the rest to be low stakes.  Hence the strong tilt to McConnell et al.)So here is a possible Democratic counter:OK, you want liability protection.  Let’s give it to

Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Syll writes Inequality and luxury

ro[email protected] writes July 24 Society For Chaos Theory In Psychology And Life Sciences Conference (Continued)

[email protected] writes July 23 Society For Chaos Theory In Psychology And Life Sciences Annual Conference (Virtual)

Mike Norman writes A top economist says the trillion federal deficit isn’t the problem — it’s how we’re spending the money — Paul Constant interviews Stephanie Kelton

So Mitch McConnell and the senate Republicans want blanket employer liability protection as the price of another round of economic support.  They have this leverage because Democrats kept postponing their agenda until they were the only ones with a list of things they wanted to spend money on.

(This illustrates classic bargaining theory to a T.  Bargaining power depends on how much you think you will lose if the agreement is delayed [Rubinstein] or fails completely.  Democrats feared economic damage to the public if bailout bills weren’t approved immediately.  Once the financial markets were backstopped Republicans considered the rest to be low stakes.  Hence the strong tilt to McConnell et al.)

So here is a possible Democratic counter:

OK, you want liability protection.  Let’s give it to any employer, large or small, that sets up a health and safety committee to oversee protections on the job, elected by the whole workforce, one person one vote.  If protections are consensual, liability is waived.  Otherwise proceed at your own risk.

This would be good policy, and it has the political advantage of placing liability within a larger, readily communicable frame about participation and consent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *