by Several months ago I forecast that "He who wins Prairie du Chien wins the White House." I also argued more generally that SW Wisconsin would determine Wisconsin.As of right now Trump is leading by about 2% in Wisconsin, and he seems to be ahead in most of the counties of SW Wisconsin, although Milwaukee has not yet come in. And the county Prairie du Chien is in, Crawford Trump is leading 4620 to 3953.But, for what it is worth, in the City of Prairie du Chien itself Biden is ahead 1303 to 1223. So we shall see.BTW, I think this is all the votes for that area, but I am about to go to bed, waiting to see Trump make a statement, but I am not going to wait up for the Milwaukee or other long counts.Barkley Rosser
Topics:
Barkley Rosser considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Several months ago I forecast that "He who wins Prairie du Chien wins the White House." I also argued more generally that SW Wisconsin would determine Wisconsin.
As of right now Trump is leading by about 2% in Wisconsin, and he seems to be ahead in most of the counties of SW Wisconsin, although Milwaukee has not yet come in. And the county Prairie du Chien is in, Crawford Trump is leading 4620 to 3953.
But, for what it is worth, in the City of Prairie du Chien itself Biden is ahead 1303 to 1223. So we shall see.
BTW, I think this is all the votes for that area, but I am about to go to bed, waiting to see Trump make a statement, but I am not going to wait up for the Milwaukee or other long counts.
Barkley Rosser