Summary:
Who the Hell do these academic journals think they are violating my sacred First Amendment free speech rights?We regret to inform you that we have decided not to send your manuscript to our reviewers for their comments and evaluation. In our assessment, your paper does not quite reach the bar in terms of making an original conceptual or theoretical contribution to meaningful work debates. I'm sure Fox News pundits will race to my defense. Andrew Sullivan? Glenn Greenwald? Dr. Seuss? Mx. Potato Head?
Topics:
Sandwichman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Who the Hell do these academic journals think they are violating my sacred First Amendment free speech rights?We regret to inform you that we have decided not to send your manuscript to our reviewers for their comments and evaluation. In our assessment, your paper does not quite reach the bar in terms of making an original conceptual or theoretical contribution to meaningful work debates. I'm sure Fox News pundits will race to my defense. Andrew Sullivan? Glenn Greenwald? Dr. Seuss? Mx. Potato Head?
Topics:
Sandwichman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Rinse and repeat–Truss chaos–the new benchmark — Bill Mitchell
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The man who never wavered — Alan Bates
Joel Eissenberg writes You can’t fool Mother Nature
Bill Haskell writes Grades and learning
Who the Hell do these academic journals think they are violating my sacred First Amendment free speech rights?
We regret to inform you that we have decided not to send your manuscript to our reviewers for their comments and evaluation. In our assessment, your paper does not quite reach the bar in terms of making an original conceptual or theoretical contribution to meaningful work debates.
I'm sure Fox News pundits will race to my defense. Andrew Sullivan? Glenn Greenwald? Dr. Seuss? Mx. Potato Head?