Saturday , April 27 2024
Home / Michael Hudson / Should there really be a Supreme Court? 

Should there really be a Supreme Court? 

Summary:
[unable to retrieve full-text content]Its role always has been anti-democratic. Vested interests create “checks and balances” primarily to make political systems non-responsive to demands for social reform. Historically, therefore, the checks are politically unbalanced in practice. Instead of producing a happy medium, their effect often has been to check the power of the people to assert their interests at Continue Reading The post Should there really be a Supreme Court?  first appeared on Michael Hudson.

Topics:
Michael Hudson considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Michael Hudson writes Labour in the Ancient Near East

Michael Hudson writes Germany as Collateral Damage in America’s New Cold War

Michael Hudson writes Economics as a Form of Art

Angry Bear writes Some Articles for Sunday and Easy Reading

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Its role always has been anti-democratic. Vested interests create “checks and balances” primarily to make political systems non-responsive to demands for social reform. Historically, therefore, the checks are politically unbalanced in practice. Instead of producing a happy medium, their effect often has been to check the power of the people to assert their interests at Continue Reading

The post Should there really be a Supreme Court?  first appeared on Michael Hudson.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *