[unable to retrieve full-text content]Michael Hudson and Richard Wolff critique the lack of substantive policy debate in the Trump-Harris exchange, noting that key issues like U.S.-China relations and the economic decline of the U.S. were largely ignored. Both highlight that the debate focused on personality over policy, avoiding critical topics such as de-industrialization, foreign policy in Ukraine, and the shifting global economic landscape. Hudson points out the bipartisan reluctance to confront the policies driving U.S. economic decline, while Wolff emphasizes the refusal to address systemic issues within capitalism. The conversation underscores the absence of meaningful discourse on how to navigate America’s waning global dominance. The post U.S. Foreign Policy and Economic Shifts:
Topics:
Michael Hudson considers the following as important: Interviews
This could be interesting, too:
Michael Hudson writes Something Nutty Emerging Here
Michael Hudson writes Why Banking Isn’t What You Think It Is
Michael Hudson writes The Horizon Nears on America’s Free Financial Ride
Michael Hudson writes Capital as Power in the Polycrisis
Michael Hudson and Richard Wolff critique the lack of substantive policy debate in the Trump-Harris exchange, noting that key issues like U.S.-China relations and the economic decline of the U.S. were largely ignored. Both highlight that the debate focused on personality over policy, avoiding critical topics such as de-industrialization, foreign policy in Ukraine, and the shifting global economic landscape. Hudson points out the bipartisan reluctance to confront the policies driving U.S. economic decline, while Wolff emphasizes the refusal to address systemic issues within capitalism. The conversation underscores the absence of meaningful discourse on how to navigate America’s waning global dominance.
The post U.S. Foreign Policy and Economic Shifts: Trump vs. Harris Debate Analysis first appeared on Michael Hudson.