When economic decision-making power is in the hands of the public rather than corporate interests, economies tend to have lower rates of inequality, and higher levels of productivity. These are the findings of the new international Economic Democracy Index, launched at NEF this month. The Economic Democracy Index is an innovative tool which measures and compares democratic participation and economic rights across 32 OECD countries. It reveals important new insights for our understanding of what makes an economy prosperous. This research, conducted by the
Topics:
neweconomics considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Jodi Beggs writes Economists Do It With Models 1970-01-01 00:00:00
John Quiggin writes Monday Message Board
Mike Norman writes 24 per cent annual interest on time deposits: St Petersburg Travel Notes, installment three — Gilbert Doctorow
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Daniel Waldenströms rappakalja om ojämlikheten
When economic decision-making power is in the hands of the public rather than corporate interests, economies tend to have lower rates of inequality, and higher levels of productivity. These are the findings of the new international Economic Democracy Index, launched at NEF this month.
The Economic Democracy Index is an innovative tool which measures and compares democratic participation and economic rights across 32 OECD countries. It reveals important new insights for our understanding of what makes an economy prosperous.
This research, conducted by the University of Glasgow, in partnership with Nottingham Trent University, Oxfam, and NEF, measures a much wider range of factors than are routinely considered in measures of economic democracy: not just trade union rights and cooperative enterprise, but individual economic rights, levels of public participation and the nature of economic decision-making. Uniquely, it explores relationships between economic democracy and poverty, inequality and productivity.
Proud that ground-breaking new work on #economic democracy is being launched today @NEF pic.twitter.com/hj45vsu4lT
— Andrew Pendleton (@AJPendleton) January 18, 2018
Our panel of speakers discussing the new research included Aditya Chakrabortty, Senior Economics Commentator at the Guardian; Matthew Brown, Cabinet Member for Social Justice, Inclusion and Policy at Preston City Council, which has pioneered local economic democracy measures; and Dr Katherine Trebeck, Senior Researcher at Oxfam UK.
They discussed how, among the 32 countries measured, the UK ranks 20th while the US scores lowest. Smaller countries tend to do better, but the research suggests it is not size but the institutional arrangements that matter most. There is a stark contrast between the ‘social model’ of northern European capitalism, and the more market-oriented Anglo-American economies. Eastern European countries tend to rank lower, with Slovenia as a higher-scoring outrider. The figures show a decline in economic democracy across the OECD nations since 2008, which seems to be associated with austerity measures – although France and Luxembourg are exceptions.
. @NEF Talk on #economicdemocracy index: Important conclusions on #workersrights #productivity #poverty @demoecon https://t.co/DRE982zcVg pic.twitter.com/mDNsh5PCYs
— Natalie Bennett (@natalieben) January 18, 2018
A key finding is that high levels of economic democracy reduce inequality (measured by the Gini Coefficient) and generate higher productivity.
At @NEF for the launch of the International Index of Economic Deomcracy. @chakrabortty outlines why this is a key issue: lack of #economicdemocracy associated with greater #inequality & says the public are ahead of the political classes in understanding this
— Louise Russell (@_LouiseRP) January 18, 2018
The team is currently investigating impacts on sustainable development indicators, and early findings suggest that economic democracy also has a positive impact on green goals such as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
The Index adds evidential weight to what has always been instinctive to progressives: that real empowerment of people through genuinely democratic forms of governance is highly desirable on practical as well as ethical grounds. It undermines the orthodox assumption that workers’ rights are bad for the economy
This research suggests that what we need for a good society is to give people security and control over their lives: decentralise decision-making, promote transparency, and ensure genuine engagement in decision-making at all levels of economic activity, from the shop-floor, to the firm, to local and national government policy-making.
.@chakrabortty at the launch of a @NEF index to measure economies according to wellbeing and workers’ rights: “This is one of those attempts to get to what is structurally wrong across our economy, which is the sense that people don’t have a voice.” #edi https://t.co/T6bs5VD8Kf pic.twitter.com/Zfua4CImu3
— Far Nearer (@far_nearer) January 18, 2018
The Index emphasises the need to go beyond GDP as a measure of economic success: instead we need to examine wellbeing, sustainability, workers’ rights, business ownership, accountability, transparency, and corruption.
“This research shows that some of the things we have railed against as bad for the economy for thirty years we can now say with certainty are not,” @acumbers @NEF on workers rights and trade unions at the launch of a new Economic Democracy Index #edi https://t.co/T6bs5VD8Kf
— Far Nearer (@far_nearer) January 18, 2018