Heterodox
Summary:
This is merely a list and, as usual, off the top of my head. Paul A. Samuelson (1966). A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568-583. Mark Blaug (1975). The Cambridge revolution: Success of failure? A critical analysis of Cambridge theories of value and distribution. Institute of Economic Affairs. Joseph E. Stiglitz (1974). The Cambridge-Cambridge controversy on the theory of capital: A view from New Haven. Christopher J. Bliss (1975). Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Elsevier North-Holland. Avinash Dixit (1977). The accumulation of capital theory. Oxford Economic Papers 29: 1-29. Edwin Burmeister (1980). Capital Theory and Dynamics, Cambridge University Press. Frank Hahn (1982). The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353-374. Andreu Mas Colell
Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important: Criticisms of Sraffian Economics
This could be interesting, too:
This is merely a list and, as usual, off the top of my head. Paul A. Samuelson (1966). A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568-583. Mark Blaug (1975). The Cambridge revolution: Success of failure? A critical analysis of Cambridge theories of value and distribution. Institute of Economic Affairs. Joseph E. Stiglitz (1974). The Cambridge-Cambridge controversy on the theory of capital: A view from New Haven. Christopher J. Bliss (1975). Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Elsevier North-Holland. Avinash Dixit (1977). The accumulation of capital theory. Oxford Economic Papers 29: 1-29. Edwin Burmeister (1980). Capital Theory and Dynamics, Cambridge University Press. Frank Hahn (1982). The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353-374. Andreu Mas Colell
Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important: Criticisms of Sraffian Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Brad DeLong, Noah Smith, And Others On The Cambridge Capital Controversy
Robert Vienneau writes “When Economists Are Wrong”
Robert Vienneau writes Some Positions Some Take On Sraffa’s Book
Robert Vienneau writes On Milana’s Purported Solution To The Reswitching Paradox
This is merely a list and, as usual, off the top of my head.
- Paul A. Samuelson (1966). A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568-583.
- Mark Blaug (1975). The Cambridge revolution: Success of failure? A critical analysis of Cambridge theories of value and distribution. Institute of Economic Affairs.
- Joseph E. Stiglitz (1974). The Cambridge-Cambridge controversy on the theory of capital: A view from New Haven.
- Christopher J. Bliss (1975). Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Elsevier North-Holland.
- Avinash Dixit (1977). The accumulation of capital theory. Oxford Economic Papers 29: 1-29.
- Edwin Burmeister (1980). Capital Theory and Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.
- Frank Hahn (1982). The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353-374.
- Andreu Mas Colell (1989). Capital theory paradoxes: Anything goes. In Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory (ed. by G. R. Feiwel), Macmillan.
- Mario Ferretti (2004). The neo-Ricardian critique: An anniversary assessment.
- Gaetano Bloise and Pietro Reichlin (2005). An obtrusive remark on capital and comparative statics.
- Michael Mandler (). Sraffian economics (new developments). In New Palgrave, 2nd edition.
I could have cited many more references from Burmeister, Mandler, or Samuelson. I do not know if the last two were published as anything more than working papers. As far as I am concerned, most mainstream economists also ignore the neoclassical side of the CCC.