Can I adapt Roemer's work, suitably taking into account later work by D'Agata and Zambelli, to found this approach to markup pricing? As a start, I here quote Roemer on a reproducible solution (RS), before he takes into account unequal rates of profits and a choice of technique. Given the role of endowments, is this a neoclassical approach, like Hahn's 1984 CJE paper? Even so, is it a valid justification for Sraffa's price equations? Notice there are no subscripts for time below. "There are N capitalists; the νth one is endowed with a vector of produced commodity endowments ων ... Capitalist ν starts with capital ων, which he seeks to turn in more wealth at the highest rate of return. Thus the program of capitalist ν is Facing prices p, to choose xν ≥ 0 to max (p - (p A + L)) xν
Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important: Example in Mathematical Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Labor Values And Invariants
Robert Vienneau writes Two Special Cases For The Labor Theory Of Value
Robert Vienneau writes Variation On An Example From Schefold
Robert Vienneau writes A Parameter Space for an Example of Harrod-Neutral Technical Progress
Can I adapt Roemer's work, suitably taking into account later work by D'Agata and Zambelli, to found this approach to markup pricing? As a start, I here quote Roemer on a reproducible solution (RS), before he takes into account unequal rates of profits and a choice of technique. Given the role of endowments, is this a neoclassical approach, like Hahn's 1984 CJE paper? Even so, is it a valid justification for Sraffa's price equations? Notice there are no subscripts for time below.
"There are N capitalists; the νth one is endowed with a vector of produced commodity endowments ων ... Capitalist ν starts with capital ων, which he seeks to turn in more wealth at the highest rate of return. Thus the program of capitalist ν isFacing prices p, tochoose xν ≥ 0 tomax (p - (p A + L)) xνs.t. (p A + L) xν ≤ p ων(The constraint says that the inputs costs can be covered by current capital.) Let us call Aν(p) the set of solution vectors to this program." -- Roemer (1981: 18-19, I made changes for typesetting mathematics).
Roemer defines a RS:
"Definition 1.1: A price vector p is a reproducible solution for the economy {A, L; b; ω1, ..., ωN} if:We shall also refer to the entire set {p, x1, ..., xN} as a reproducible solution." -- Roemer (1981: 19-20, with for math).
- For all ν, there exists xν in Aν(p), such that (profit maximization)
- x = Σ xν and x ≥ A x + (L x) b (reproducibility)
- p b = 1 (subsistence wage)
- A x + (L x) ≤ ω = Σ ων (feasibility)
A RS can only exist if the elements of the endowment vector are in certain proportions:
"Theorem 1.2: Let the model {A, L, b} be given with A productive and indecomposable, and the rate of exploitation e > 0. Let {p, x1, ..., xN} be a nontrivial RS. (i.e., Σ xν = x ≠ 0). Then the vector of prices p is the E[qual] P[rofit] R[ate] vector p*. Furthermore, a RS exists if and only if omega is an element of C*, where C* is a particular convex cone in [the space of n-dimensional real vectors] containing the balanced growth path of {A, L, b}. (C* is specified precisely below.)" -- Roemer (1981: 20, with changes for math).
Even though endoments are taken as given in defining the firm's LP, endowments are endogenous in the sense that they must lie close to those on a balanced growth path. I like to have labor advanced and wages paid out of the surplus, instead of vice versa as above. The above does not allow for a choice of technique. Roemer has at least some of this in later chapters.
References- John E. Roemer. 1981. Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press.