Saturday , April 27 2024
Home / Stavros Mavroudeas Blog / Financialization Hypothesis: A Theoretical and Empirical Critique Author(s): Turan Subasat , Stavros Mavroudeas Journal: World Review of Political Economy vol.14 no.2

Financialization Hypothesis: A Theoretical and Empirical Critique Author(s): Turan Subasat , Stavros Mavroudeas Journal: World Review of Political Economy vol.14 no.2

Summary:
Abstract The financialization hypothesis (FH) is a popular leitmotiv which argues that the financial system conquers the commanding heights of the capitalist economy. It maintains that finance gained independence from productive-capital and began to dominate it. The FH bases this argument on several empirical claims concerning the size and the strategic role of financial entities. This article offers a critique of crucial analytical and empirical claims of the FH. It argues that the FH overrates the importance of novel financial instruments, misunderstands their function and, thus, fails to situate the role of finance in the capitalist system. Especially, it erroneously divorces finance from and superimposes it on productive-capital. Moreover, this article argues that crucial

Topics:
Stavros Mavroudeas considers the following as important: , , , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Stavros Mavroudeas writes Once Again on the Alleged Differences between Marx and Engels – S.Mavroudeas 2023 WAPE Forum

Stavros Mavroudeas writes Chinese translation of THE GREEK CAPITALISM IN CRISIS – MARXIST ANALYSES

Stavros Mavroudeas writes Interview of S.Mavroudeas for EL CONFIDENTIAL on the state of the EU and the Greek economy

Stavros Mavroudeas writes On the anniversary of F.Engels death

Abstract

The financialization hypothesis (FH) is a popular leitmotiv which argues that the financial system conquers the commanding heights of the capitalist economy. It maintains that finance gained independence from productive-capital and began to dominate it. The FH bases this argument on several empirical claims concerning the size and the strategic role of financial entities. This article offers a critique of crucial analytical and empirical claims of the FH. It argues that the FH overrates the importance of novel financial instruments, misunderstands their function and, thus, fails to situate the role of finance in the capitalist system. Especially, it erroneously divorces finance from and superimposes it on productive-capital. Moreover, this article argues that crucial empirical claims of the FH do not stand up to scrutiny.

The links to download the article are:

https://www.academia.edu/104917835/Financialization_Hypothesis_A_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Critique

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372595077_Financialization_Hypothesis_A_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Critique

Stavros Mavroudeas
He is currently Professor of Political Economy at the Department of Social Policy of Panteion University. He was previously Professor of Political Economy at the Department of Economics of the University of Macedonia. He studied at the Economics Department of the National Kapodistriakon University of Athens, from where he received his BA Economics (1985 - First Class Honours).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *