Monday , September 16 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / For a Fiscal Neutrality Amendment

For a Fiscal Neutrality Amendment

Summary:
For a Fiscal Neutrality Amendment Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment: “No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues.  The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits.  Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.” Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional.  Restrictions on property tax rates or government

Topics:
Peter Dorman considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Bill Haskell writes USPS has been Addressing Mail Slowdown in the Guise of Improvements

Angry Bear writes TSMC and Intel building Plants in Phoenix

Robert Waldmann writes The Expected Inflation Imp

Angry Bear writes No Improvements in Delivery Yet from DeJoy’s USPS Plan

For a Fiscal Neutrality Amendment

Against the dogmatic ignorance of a proposed amendment to the US constitution mandating a balanced budget, I propose an alternative, a fiscal neutrality amendment:

“No unit of government within the United States may establish voting or other decision procedures that embody a bias in favor of either higher or lower tax rates and revenues.  The federal government may not adopt voting or procedural restrictions that bias decision-making in favor of either larger or smaller fiscal deficits.  Fiscal policies should be assessed on their merits according to neutral procedures.”

Requirements for supermajorities to raise taxes but not lower them should be unconstitutional.  Restrictions on property tax rates or government revenues as a proportion of aggregate income or some other benchmark should be unconstitutional as well.  Nor should the federal government be encumbered in its choice of appropriate fiscal policy.  The historical record shows policy errors have been made in all directions; there is no reasonable basis for biasing policy away from one set of mistakes only to bias it toward another.

A parallel agreement to replace the EU’s (In)Stability and (De)Growth Pact would also be desirable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *