by Summary:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes Duck and cover
Joel Eissenberg writes The branding of Medicaid
Angry Bear writes USMAC Exempts Certain Items Coming out of Mexico and Canada
Bill Haskell writes Defying a Federal Judge’s Orders
|