by Summary:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Moving forward
Dean Baker writes Health insurance killing: Economics does have something to say
NewDealdemocrat writes Retail Real Sales
Angry Bear writes Planned Tariffs, An Economy Argument with Political Implications
|