by Summary:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
In this second half of the first lecture, I explain Sippel’s result that most people aren’t “rational” as Neoclassical economists define it–because the Neoclassical definition of rational behavior is computationally impossible. The next lecture–which I’ll post next week–explains that even if the Neoclassical model of individual behavior was sound (which I’ve just shown it isn’t), ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model
Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW
Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE
Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius
|