Saturday , May 11 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Project Perjury

Project Perjury

Summary:
Project Perjury The Washington Post has a story about the Erie, Pennsylvania postal worker who claimed to not have not recanted his fantasy about overhearing a conspiracy to backdate ballots. For some unknown reason Project Veritas thinks the audiotape of the postal worker’s interview with investigators from the Post Office Inspector General’s proves the opposite of what it does. There is no coercion in the interview. The investigators repeatedly advise Hopkins of his right to not speak to them and his right to have a lawyer present. And in no uncertain terms, he recants his affidavit story, even claiming he didn’t read what the Project Veritas lawyers had written for him to sign. [embedded content] Of course, the MAGA cultists commenting on the Youtube

Topics:
Sandwichman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Angry Bear writes Republican U.S. States Sue EPA over Strict Power Plant Emission Rules

Angry Bear writes Clawback of money looted by Cerberus, de la Torre, and MPT from Steward Health Care

Bill Haskell writes Continuous trump Trials, May 7th Notes, “Stormy”

Angry Bear writes Microsoft is investing .3 billion dollars to build a new data center in Racine Wisconsin

Project Perjury

The Washington Post has a story about the Erie, Pennsylvania postal worker who claimed to not have not recanted his fantasy about overhearing a conspiracy to backdate ballots. For some unknown reason Project Veritas thinks the audiotape of the postal worker’s interview with investigators from the Post Office Inspector General’s proves the opposite of what it does. There is no coercion in the interview. The investigators repeatedly advise Hopkins of his right to not speak to them and his right to have a lawyer present. And in no uncertain terms, he recants his affidavit story, even claiming he didn’t read what the Project Veritas lawyers had written for him to sign.

Of course, the MAGA cultists commenting on the Youtube audio are aghast that an investigator would ask courageous whistleblower questions in a way that makes him think twice about what he had sworn to in an affidavit. I would copy and paste the Washington Post article here but I don’t want to violate copywrite. I’m sure it will show up in the comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *