Monday , December 23 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / May Retail Sales Fell 1.3% After April Sales Were Revised 1.4% Higher

May Retail Sales Fell 1.3% After April Sales Were Revised 1.4% Higher

Summary:
Commenter RJS and MarketWatch 666 blogger Seasonally adjusted retail sales fell 1.3% in May after retail sales for April were revised 1.4% higher . . . the Advance Retail Sales Report for May (pdf) from the Census Bureau estimated that our seasonally adjusted retail and food services sales totaled 0.2 billion for the month, which was a decrease of 1.3 percent (±0.5%) from April’s revised sales of 8.7 billion, but 28.1 percent (±0.7 percent) above the adjusted sales of May of last year…April’s seasonally adjusted sales were revised from the 9.9 billion reported last month to 8.7 billion, while March sales were revised from 9.8 billion to 3.12 billion, which meant that March to April percent change was revised from virtually

Topics:
run75441 considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes Retail Real Sales

Angry Bear writes Planned Tariffs, An Economy Argument with Political Implications

Joel Eissenberg writes Will DOGE be an exercise in futility?

Bill Haskell writes Funding Public Goods Problematic??? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire

Commenter RJS and MarketWatch 666 blogger

Seasonally adjusted retail sales fell 1.3% in May after retail sales for April were revised 1.4% higher . . . the Advance Retail Sales Report for May (pdf) from the Census Bureau estimated that our seasonally adjusted retail and food services sales totaled $620.2 billion for the month, which was a decrease of 1.3 percent (±0.5%) from April’s revised sales of $628.7 billion, but 28.1 percent (±0.7 percent) above the adjusted sales of May of last year…April’s seasonally adjusted sales were revised from the $619.9 billion reported last month to $628.7 billion, while March sales were revised from $619.8 billion to $623.12 billion, which meant that March to April percent change was revised from virtually unchanged (±0.5%) to an increase of 0.9 percent (± 0.2 percent) . . . the $3.3 billion upward revision to March sales should increase nominal first quarter PCE at around a $13 billion annual rate and add about 0.23 percentage points, give or take, to 1st quarter GDP when the 3rd estimate is released at the end of the month . . . estimated sales before seasonal adjustments, which were extrapolated from surveys of a small sampling of retailers, indicated sales actually rose 3.0% before the adjustment, from $625,636 million in April to $644,362 million in May, while they were up 27.7% from the $504,607 million in actual sales of May a year ago . . .

Included below is the table of the monthly and yearly percentage changes in sales by business type taken from the Census pdf….the first double column below gives us the seasonally adjusted percentage change in sales for each type of retail business from April to May in the first sub-column, and then the year over year percentage change for those businesses since last May in the 2nd column; the second pair of columns gives us the revision of last month’s April advance monthly estimates (now called “preliminary”) as revised with this report, likewise for each business type, with the March to April change under “Mar 2021 r” (revised) and the revised April 2020 to April 2021 percentage change in the last column shown…for your reference, our copy of the table of last month’s advance April estimates, before this month’s revision, is here . . .

May Retail Sales Fell 1.3% After April Sales Were Revised 1.4% Higher

Significant revisions to April sales with this report are almost a larger story than the May sales themselves…for example, motor vehicle sales were originally reported as up 2.9% to $129,911 million in April; they’re now shown to have been up 4.3% to $131,562 million…at the same time, restaurant and bar sales were originally reported as up 3.0% to $64,872 million in April; they’re now shown to have been up 4.5% to $66,095 million…similarly, clothing store sales had been reported down 5.1% to $23,497 million in April; they’re now indicated to be down just 2.0% to $24,521 million . . . on the other hand, sales at building material and supplies dealers were originally reported down 0.4% to $43,204 million; they’re now shown to be down 2.3% to $42,437 million . . . the pdf for the April advance report, as originally published, is here, should you want more details on those April sales revisions . . .

To compute May’s real personal consumption of goods data for national accounts from this May retail sales report, the BEA will use the corresponding price changes from the May consumer price index, which we reviewed last week . . . to estimate what they will find, we’ll first separate out the volatile sales of gasoline from the other totals…from the third line on the above table, we can see that May retail sales excluding the 0.7% increase in sales at gas stations were down by 1.5%…then, by subtracting the actual dollar amounts representing the 1.0% increase in grocery & beverage sales and the 1.8% increase in food services sales from that total, we find that core retail sales were down by more than 2.4% for the month….since the May CPI report showed that the the composite price index of all goods less food and energy goods was 1.8% higher in May, we can thus figure that the change in real retail sales excluding food and energy sales will amount to a decrease of more than 4.1%…however, the actual adjustment in national accounts for each of the types of sales shown above will vary by the change in the related price index…for instance, while nominal sales at motor vehicle & parts dealers were down 3.9% in May, the May price index for transportation commodities other than fuel was 4.0% higher, which would suggest that real unit sales at auto & parts dealers were probably on the order of  7.6% lower once price increases are taken into account… similarly, while nominal sales at clothing stores were 3.0% higher in May, the apparel price index was 1.2% higher, which suggests that real sales of clothing only rose around 1.8% . . .

In addition to figuring those core retail sales, to make an estimate of the month’s change in real sales, we’ll need to adjust food and energy retail sales for their price changes separately, just as the BEA will do.…the May CPI report showed that the food price index was 0.4% higher, as the price index for food purchased for use at home rose 0.4% while the index for food bought away from home was 0.6% higher…thus, while nominal sales at food and beverage stores were 1.0% higher, real sales of food and beverages would have been around 0.6% higher in light of the 0.4% higher prices…meanwhile, the 1.8% increase in nominal sales at bars and restaurants, once adjusted for 0.6% higher prices, suggests that real sales at bars and restaurants only rose around 1.2% during the month…on the other hand, while sales at gas stations were up 0.7%, there was also a 0.4% decrease in the price of gasoline during the month, which would suggest that real sales of gasoline were up on the order of 1.1% higher, with a caveat that gasoline stations do sell more than gasoline, products which should not be adjusted with gasoline prices, so the actual increase in real sales at gas stations was likely a bit smaller…reweighing and averaging the real sales changes that we have thus estimated back together, and excluding food services, we can then estimate that the income and outlays report for May will show that real personal consumption of goods fell by around 3.3% in May, after rising by a revised 0.1% in April and rising by a revised 9.4% in March, but after falling by 3.4% in February and rising by 7.3% in January…at the same time, the 1.2% increase in real sales at bars and restaurants will add a solid 0.1% to the growth rate of May’s real personal consumption of services….note that despite the 3.3% decrease in real personal consumption of goods in May, the 9.4% increase in March PCE goods means that real May sales were still significantly higher than those of January and February, and thus will have a similarly significant positive impact on 2nd quarter GDP . . .

About run75441

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *