Sunday , October 24 2021
Home / The Angry Bear / The Open Access Movement In Academic Publishing

The Open Access Movement In Academic Publishing

Summary:
The Open Access Movement In Academic Publishing I apologize that I look like someone voting for 3.5 and then sometime later saying that they only support 1.5, but I am not interested now in discussing that matter.  So, here I go. 1) I support Open Access in academic journal publications. 2) OTOH I grant that commercial publishers of academic journals should be able to demand payment for people accessing articles fully available in their journals, within “reason.”  3) I agree that academic journals should allow authors to allow free access to their articles, but also that they may allow this not to be the case. So, let me be more specific here. I have recently had a difficult situation regarding this. So awhile ago I was invited by

Topics:
Barkley Rosser considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

run75441 writes Quality Issues, Kawasaki Subway Car Wheels are Moving Outwards

run75441 writes Eastman’s Memo giving Pence Direction on Overturning the 2020 Election

Barkley Rosser writes Goodbye Gene Weingarten

run75441 writes Subpoenas Issued, Focusing on Trump’s role in the January 6 insurrection

The Open Access Movement In Academic Publishing

I apologize that I look like someone voting for 3.5 and then sometime later saying that they only support 1.5, but I am not interested now in discussing that matter. 

So, here I go.

1) I support Open Access in academic journal publications.

2) OTOH I grant that commercial publishers of academic journals should be able to demand payment for people accessing articles fully available in their journals, within “reason.” 

3) I agree that academic journals should allow authors to allow free access to their articles, but also that they may allow this not to be the case.

So, let me be more specific here. I have recently had a difficult situation regarding this. So awhile ago I was invited by someone I know I take seriously to submit a paper for a special issue in this issue, a 30-year retrospective on econophysics in the mostly physics journal, Entropy, published by mdpli.

I did not fully read the long pro-open access screed that accompanied this invitation, which came after the invitation from someone I knew personally. The publisher, mdpi, provided a very long proclamation explaining their support for the Open Access Movement, something I generally favor. Anyway, I poozed out on reading their long speech on this, so missed far down into it where they declared that any author publishing in their journal should agree to pay a sum defined in Swiss currency terms just below $2000. So when my paper was accepted after a long pile of mostly bs, I received an invoice for nearly 2K USD,, which I was unaware was coming due.

So there is this movement for open access that has become a very big deal in US academia. It involves academic library relations with major publishers of journals and much else. It has led to my own uni, JMU, no longer accepting papers from a journal I used to edit, JEBO, a journal pubbed by “the evil empire,” Elsevier. This decision by my uni’s library meant that I got a 10 percent discount on the invoice that arrived on my desk to publish this paper, “Econophysics and the Entropic Foundations of Economics.”.

I have very mixed feelings about all this. I have had journals offer me this option after they accepted a paper of mine to allow open access of my paper if I would pay about 2k. But if I said no, then my paper would be published.  When recently offered such an option, I failed to accept them.

When this invoice came I complained mightily. Eventually, they offered a large discount, and my uni paid for it. But I see a serious bottom line here:

who is supposed to pay for all this, authors or their bakers or others?

This is mostly a physics journal, and most of them have funds in their grants for publication costs. But most social scientists do not have such funds in their grants even when they have them. There is a serious bottom line here, and I do not think authors should be made to pay for this.

Barkley Rosser

Barkley Rosser
I remember how loud it was. I was a young Economics undergraduate, and most professors didn’t really slam points home the way Dr. Rosser did. He would bang on the table and throw things around the classroom. Not for the faint of heart, but he definitely kept my attention and made me smile. It is hard to not smile around J. Barkley Rosser, especially when he gets going on economic theory. The passion comes through and encourages you to come along with it in a truly contagious way. After meeting him, it is as if you can just tell that anybody who knows that much and has that much to say deserves your attention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *