Tuesday , November 5 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / The anti-libertarian approach to COVID policy

The anti-libertarian approach to COVID policy

Summary:
Here is Michael Bang Petersen in the New York Times: As a researcher and an adviser to the Danish government on the pandemic, I have repeatedly stressed that we need to make complex trade-offs between deaths, the economy, public well-being and constitutional rights. There is not a single right answer for how to proceed. Within the set of legitimate strategies, the choice of strategy is often less important than whether or not people follow and support it.This perfectly captures the spirit of a sensible response to COVID that balances the claims of democracy and expertise. Petersen acknowledges that there are complicated tradeoffs involved in policymaking, and that reasonable people can disagree on the best way forward.  This encourages people to

Topics:
Eric Kramer considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes Real GDP for Q3 nicely positive, but long leading components mediocre to negative for the second quarter in a row

Joel Eissenberg writes Healthcare and the 2024 presidential election

Angry Bear writes Title 8 Apprehensions, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 Inadmissible, and Title 42 Expulsions

Bill Haskell writes Trump’s Proposals Could Bankrupt a Vital and Popular Program Within Six Years

Here is Michael Bang Petersen in the New York Times:

As a researcher and an adviser to the Danish government on the pandemic, I have repeatedly stressed that we need to make complex trade-offs between deaths, the economy, public well-being and constitutional rights. There is not a single right answer for how to proceed. Within the set of legitimate strategies, the choice of strategy is often less important than whether or not people follow and support it.

This perfectly captures the spirit of a sensible response to COVID that balances the claims of democracy and expertise.

Petersen acknowledges that there are complicated tradeoffs involved in policymaking, and that reasonable people can disagree on the best way forward.  This encourages people to have some humility about their own policy beliefs.  This is essential for democracy, because democracy requires a willingness to compromise.

Petersen also acknowledges that policymakers need to be willing to defer to public opinion.  This is also essential for democracy.  Good policymaking requires responsible political leaders and competent experts, but these elites need to recognize the limits of their influence.  The alternative is populist backlash, which is an all-too-real threat in the United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *