Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / New Economic Perspectives / The Whistleblowers’ Plan Offers Hillary the Perfect Opportunity

The Whistleblowers’ Plan Offers Hillary the Perfect Opportunity

Summary:
William K. Black February 10, 2016     Bloomington, MN I am writing as one of the four founding members of Bank Whistleblowers United.  We came together recently to create a detailed plan that could restore the rule of law to Wall Street and dramatically reduce the risk and damage of future financial crises.  We crafted it so that it could be implemented without any new legislation or regulation.  We offered our aid in the implementation process to any candidate who wins the election – and pointed out that President Obama could implement it immediately.  Our plan and approach virtually defines the word “pragmatic.”  It would also transform finance and begin to end its corrupt culture. In response to Bernie’s big election win in New Hampshire, a political scientist rushed out a piece in the New York Times advising Hillary how to do a PR makeover.  His advice was “peddling pragmatism,” by which he meant the opposite – an effort to rebrand Hillary through slogans.  The political scientist does, however, understand Hillary’s key liability – the one that Krugman was foolish enough to think was an asset – “she often sounds as if she were acquiescing to a status quo that Democrats find objectionable.”  Actually, she is acquiescing to a status quo that is objectively far beyond “objectionable.

Topics:
William Black considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

William Black writes Lawrence O’Donnell Aims at Buttigieg, But Hits New Democrats

Devin Smith writes How White Collar Criminals Get Away with Murder

Devin Smith writes Trump: The Most Corrupt President in US History

Devin Smith writes Exposed! A Serial Whistleblower’s Story with Bill Black

William K. Black
February 10, 2016     Bloomington, MN

I am writing as one of the four founding members of Bank Whistleblowers United.  We came together recently to create a detailed plan that could restore the rule of law to Wall Street and dramatically reduce the risk and damage of future financial crises.  We crafted it so that it could be implemented without any new legislation or regulation.  We offered our aid in the implementation process to any candidate who wins the election – and pointed out that President Obama could implement it immediately.  Our plan and approach virtually defines the word “pragmatic.”  It would also transform finance and begin to end its corrupt culture.

In response to Bernie’s big election win in New Hampshire, a political scientist rushed out a piece in the New York Times advising Hillary how to do a PR makeover.  His advice was “peddling pragmatism,” by which he meant the opposite – an effort to rebrand Hillary through slogans.  The political scientist does, however, understand Hillary’s key liability – the one that Krugman was foolish enough to think was an asset – “she often sounds as if she were acquiescing to a status quo that Democrats find objectionable.”  Actually, she is acquiescing to a status quo that is objectively far beyond “objectionable.”  It isn’t simply Democrats that find it unacceptable for a pervasively corrupt Wall Street to maintain its destructive power over our economy and our democracy, that view is shared by the vast majority of Republicans and independents.

Hillary does not “sound as if” she is “acquiescing” to Wall Street’s stranglehold.  Hillary’s most prominent economics supporter, Krugman, urged us to vote for her because Hillary will not seek to break Wall Street’s corrupt power.  Paul Krugman, in an article meant to attack Bernie Sanders, accidentally misfired and shot Hillary Clinton when he admitted that Dodd-Frank did not even try “breaking [Wall Street’s] power” over our economy and democracy – and praised that failure.  Hillary’s fundamental problem is that after an adult lifetime in which she and Bill formed a mutual support society with Wall Street few find her claims to a Road to Damascus conversion credible.  In the last debate, when trying to demonstrate how tough she was on Wall Street the best she could muster was to call the elite bankers’ frauds that caused the Great Recession “shenanigans” – childish pranks.

Endorsing our plan to restore the rule of law to Wall Street is the perfect opportunity for Hillary to embrace pragmatism and credibly demonstrate that she refuses to “acquiesce” to Wall Street’s continued corrupt power over our economy and our democracy.  She simply has to pledge to implement our plan to demonstrate that she has embraced pragmatic, vital change that will break Wall Street’s dangerous power over our economy and democracy.

Similarly, Hillary is faced with a simple choice, but also an enormous opportunity, by our proposed campaign pledge.  She could announce that she had reconsidered her fundraising in light of our plan and decided that it was wrong to take campaign contributions and fees from financial felons.  She is locked into a harmful dynamic now in which she tries to defend taking large amounts of money from banks.  She could escape that trap by agreeing not to take contributions from banks that the U.S. and its agencies, after investigation, have charged with committing felonies.  The issue would no longer be her refusal to admit that campaign contributions affect politics and instead became one of integrity and ethics.  She would be on the right side of that issue if she made our campaign pledge.  We ask all the candidates to stop taking contributions from the financial felons.

Bank Whistleblowers United will identify publicly which candidates pledge to implement our plan in whole or in specified part.  There is no excuse for violating this pledge, for it can be implemented without any reliance on new legislation or regulation.  Any candidate who takes the pledge and fails to implement will be exposed as a liar.  That is why we have some degree of confidence that candidates that take the pledge will actually implement the plan.  Please ask the candidate you are considering supporting to go on record as to whether they support or oppose the pragmatic plan of the Bank Whistleblowers United.

President Obama can implement our plan now if he has the will to restore the rule of law to Wall Street and break its corrupt power.  There are no excuses based on Republican control of the House and the Senate when it comes to implementing our plan.  The President could begin to implement it tomorrow.  We hope the American people will join us in urging that he do so.

We have designed our plan pragmatically so that any President can implement it.  All the President needs to implement our plan is the integrity, the will, and the courage to break Wall Street’s power.  The Bank Whistleblowers United know all about what it takes to personally summon the integrity, the will, and the courage to “speak truth to power.”  We did so in circumstances where we knew we would suffer fierce retaliation.  Our power, compared to those elite bank fraudsters we confronted was that of a tiny skiff facing a raging ocean.

Wall Street, its political henchmen and women, and the anti-regulators appointed to run most of our regulatory agencies since 1993 are immensely powerful and work together to maintain Wall Street’s corrupt power.  The fraudulent bankers wear nice suits, but they are brutal and unrestrained in seeking to discredit and destroy those that speak truth to power.  We have the scar tissue that ensures we will never forget these facts.

But the President of the United States has incomparably greater powers and protections than we had.  Should she or he have a burning will to make breaking Wall Street’s corrupt power a top priority, the integrity to refuse the enormous (perfectly legal) bribes Wall Street offers in the form of speeches, consulting gigs, and board seats, and the courage to restore the rule of law in the face of Wall Street’s smear machine they will succeed in implementing our pragmatic plan.  We understand, from the inside, how fraud became Wall Street’s business plan and we know what works to break the power of those elite frauds.

Our plan provides an objective gut check for every candidate.  Talk is cheap.  If you believe what you say about the need to restore the rule of law to Wall Street, pledge to implement our plan.  If you believe that politicians should not be funded by the elite Wall Street felons, take our campaign funding pledge.  The Bank Whistleblowers United stand ready to help you implement the plan and train your personnel on how the fraud schemes work.

William Black
William Kurt Black (born September 6, 1951) is an American lawyer, academic, author, and a former bank regulator. Black's expertise is in white-collar crime, public finance, regulation, and other topics in law and economics. He developed the concept of "control fraud", in which a business or national executive uses the entity he or she controls as a "weapon" to commit fraud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *