Summary:
This paper uses hysteresis to develop the concept of policy lock-in and lock-out. Policy changes may near-irrevocably change the economy’s structure, thereby changing the distribution of wealth, income and power. That may lock-in policy by changing the political equilibrium. Exit costs that block policy reversals also cause lock-in. Conventional thinking treats policy as a dial ...
Topics:
Thomas Palley considers the following as important: Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
This paper uses hysteresis to develop the concept of policy lock-in and lock-out. Policy changes may near-irrevocably change the economy’s structure, thereby changing the distribution of wealth, income and power. That may lock-in policy by changing the political equilibrium. Exit costs that block policy reversals also cause lock-in. Conventional thinking treats policy as a dial [...]
This paper uses hysteresis to develop the concept of policy lock-in and lock-out. Policy changes may near-irrevocably change the economy’s structure, thereby changing the distribution of wealth, income and power. That may lock-in policy by changing the political equilibrium. Exit costs that block policy reversals also cause lock-in. Conventional thinking treats policy as a dial ...
Topics:
Thomas Palley considers the following as important: Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Peter Radford writes Weekend read – The trouble with words
Dean Baker writes In a free market, drugs are cheap, government-granted patent monopolies make them expensive
Lars Pålsson Syll writes I heard there’s some good shit on TV tonight …
Dean Baker writes Is “greedflation” over?