Following some recent discussions, I decided to relax my usual policy of banning climate denialists. So, I’m opening a forum where anyone who thinks they have something useful to contribute on the topic. Some rules Real names only, no pseudonyms. If you have something to say on this topic, own it. If your point is on this list, don’t bother making it. For the moment, only climate science arguments, not policy claims like “Australia only contributes 1 per cent”. Initially, at least I’d prefer to leave the field open to sceptics/deniers. The rest of us can have our say a bit later. To prevent spam/trolling etc all posts from new contributors will be moderated. Share this:Like this:Like Loading...
Topics:
John Quiggin considers the following as important: Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Editor writes new issue of Real-World Economics Review
John Quiggin writes Towards deliberative Parliaments: Greens success at recent elections points the way
Editor writes Long Read – Is Bitcoin more energy intensive than mainstream finance?
Peter Radford writes Weekend read – The trouble with words
Following some recent discussions, I decided to relax my usual policy of banning climate denialists. So, I’m opening a forum where anyone who thinks they have something useful to contribute on the topic. Some rules
- Real names only, no pseudonyms. If you have something to say on this topic, own it.
- If your point is on this list, don’t bother making it.
- For the moment, only climate science arguments, not policy claims like “Australia only contributes 1 per cent”.
Initially, at least I’d prefer to leave the field open to sceptics/deniers. The rest of us can have our say a bit later.
To prevent spam/trolling etc all posts from new contributors will be moderated.