Suppose one wants to quantitatively measure the growth in productivity over centuries. And one wants to look at specific commodities that can be said to have existed over such a long time. Think of a lumen of light or a food calorie. How can one do this? The definition of a price index over such a long time period is questionable. Adam Smith addressed this problem. Some would find his approach common sense. One could ask how long must a common laborer work to be able to afford the commodity in question. More recently, William Nordhaus considered the question. He, too, advocated the use of a Smithian labor-commanded standard to measure technological change. (I haven't read the reference below in decades.) William D. Nordhaus (1997). Traditional Productivity Estimates are Asleep at the
Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Rinse and repeat–Truss chaos–the new benchmark — Bill Mitchell
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The man who never wavered — Alan Bates
Joel Eissenberg writes You can’t fool Mother Nature
Bill Haskell writes Grades and learning
Suppose one wants to quantitatively measure the growth in productivity over centuries. And one wants to look at specific commodities that can be said to have existed over such a long time. Think of a lumen of light or a food calorie. How can one do this? The definition of a price index over such a long time period is questionable.
Adam Smith addressed this problem. Some would find his approach common sense. One could ask how long must a common laborer work to be able to afford the commodity in question. More recently, William Nordhaus considered the question. He, too, advocated the use of a Smithian labor-commanded standard to measure technological change. (I haven't read the reference below in decades.)
- William D. Nordhaus (1997). Traditional Productivity Estimates are Asleep at the (Technological) Switch. Economic Journal 107 (444): pp. 1548-1559.