Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / Post-Keynesian / Refutation Of Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Refutation Of Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Summary:
Those who understand price theory reject the theory of the Austrian Business Cycle (ABC). I am thinking here that its logical invalidity follows from post-Sraffian capital theory. It is also wrong because of its reliance on the concept of the natural rate of interest. Some years ago, I tried to get published a demonstration that ABC theory was in error. I forget how many journals rejected it. Four or five articles here are from this series of revisions. The rejections from the journals more sympathetic to Post Keynesians generally said that everybody knows that ABC theory is wrong. The rejections from the journals more sympathetic to the Austrian school said that I ought to read more and more obscure literature. Some of this helpful for understanding of the history of ABC theory, but

Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Robert Vienneau writes Another Hayekian Triangle Not Supporting The Austrian School

Robert Vienneau writes Roger Garrison On The Inadequacy Of Hayekian Triangles

Robert Vienneau writes The Production Of Commodities And The Structure Of Production: An Example

Robert Vienneau writes The Production Of Commodities And The Structure Of Production

Those who understand price theory reject the theory of the Austrian Business Cycle (ABC). I am thinking here that its logical invalidity follows from post-Sraffian capital theory. It is also wrong because of its reliance on the concept of the natural rate of interest.

Some years ago, I tried to get published a demonstration that ABC theory was in error. I forget how many journals rejected it. Four or five articles here are from this series of revisions. The rejections from the journals more sympathetic to Post Keynesians generally said that everybody knows that ABC theory is wrong. The rejections from the journals more sympathetic to the Austrian school said that I ought to read more and more obscure literature. Some of this helpful for understanding of the history of ABC theory, but none really addressed my points.

Anyways, my favorite revision is the last. I think this is fairly good, but, as of now, do not intend to resubmit it anywhere. I find that recently some articles on the Cambridge Capital Controversies have been published in the Review of Austrian Economics.

References

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *