Sunday , December 22 2024
Home / Post-Keynesian / Future Papers For My Research Program?

Future Papers For My Research Program?

Summary:
I have sometimes written retrospectives about my research program. I have been exploring the results of perturbing parameters in models of the choice of technique. This is a bit more prospective. Illustrations of One-Dimension Pattern Diagrams: I have a selection of these written up. Independence of Economic Life of Machines and Capital-Intensity: I have the analytical results I want. I am being slow to read what I need to connect results up to Austrian capital theory. I have had a much different earlier version rejected by Metroeconomica. Illustrations of Partitions of Parameter Spaces by Fluke Switch Points: I have had a draft paper like this rejected by the Cambridge Journal of Economics. Extensive rent with perturbations of markups: I have had a paper based on this rejected by

Topics:
Robert Vienneau considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Mike Norman writes Trade deficit

Mike Norman writes Bond market now pricing in one 25 bps rate cut by Fed in 2025

New Economics Foundation writes What are we getting wrong about tax

Sandwichman writes The more this contradiction develops…

I have sometimes written retrospectives about my research program. I have been exploring the results of perturbing parameters in models of the choice of technique. This is a bit more prospective.

  • Illustrations of One-Dimension Pattern Diagrams: I have a selection of these written up.
  • Independence of Economic Life of Machines and Capital-Intensity: I have the analytical results I want. I am being slow to read what I need to connect results up to Austrian capital theory. I have had a much different earlier version rejected by Metroeconomica.
  • Illustrations of Partitions of Parameter Spaces by Fluke Switch Points: I have had a draft paper like this rejected by the Cambridge Journal of Economics.
  • Extensive rent with perturbations of markups: I have had a paper based on this rejected by the Review of Radical Political Economics. I need to reach a more definite conclusion. I probably will not go further.
  • Intensive rent with perturbations of markups: This is somewhat beyond me, and I probably will not develop this further.
  • Extensive rent, intensive rent, and markup pricing: This, too, is somewhat beyond me, and I do not see that I will pursue it soon.
  • The Choice of Technique with Harrod-Neutral Technical Progress: This is somewhat beyond me. I probably will not develop this.

I do not see if organizing my starts will inspire me to be more productive. Since I am working on my reading for the second suggestion above, maybe I should expect to be slow at this point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *