by I’ve recently written a ‘top 10’ review of a new book on supportive housing—i.e., subsidized housing with social work support—for persons with serious mental health challenges. The book’s an anthology that was edited by three Ontario-based researchers. A key questions that emerges in the book is: Should such housing be owned and operated by for-profit providers, or by non-profit providers? An advantage of non-profit ownership, in my opinion, is that a non-profit entity eventually owns the asset. My full review can be found here. Enjoy and share:
Topics:
Nick Falvo considers the following as important: aboriginal peoples, Alberta, health care, homeless, housing, indigenous people, investment, Privatization, public infrastructure, public services, seniors, social policy
This could be interesting, too:
Bill Haskell writes Q3 Update: Housing Delinquencies, Foreclosures and REO
NewDealdemocrat writes It’s not just corporate profits, the long leading housing sector is also under pressure
NewDealdemocrat writes What to look for if housing construction does forecast a recession
Bill Haskell writes Lawler: Early Read on Existing Home Sales in October
I’ve recently written a ‘top 10’ review of a new book on supportive housing—i.e., subsidized housing with social work support—for persons with serious mental health challenges. The book’s an anthology that was edited by three Ontario-based researchers.
A key questions that emerges in the book is: Should such housing be owned and operated by for-profit providers, or by non-profit providers? An advantage of non-profit ownership, in my opinion, is that a non-profit entity eventually owns the asset.
My full review can be found here.
Enjoy and share: