by I’ve recently written a ‘top 10’ review of a new book on supportive housing—i.e., subsidized housing with social work support—for persons with serious mental health challenges. The book’s an anthology that was edited by three Ontario-based researchers. A key questions that emerges in the book is: Should such housing be owned and operated by for-profit providers, or by non-profit providers? An advantage of non-profit ownership, in my opinion, is that a non-profit entity eventually owns the asset. My full review can be found here. Enjoy and share:
Topics:
Nick Falvo considers the following as important: aboriginal peoples, Alberta, health care, homeless, housing, indigenous people, investment, Privatization, public infrastructure, public services, seniors, social policy
This could be interesting, too:
NewDealdemocrat writes The bifurcation of the new vs. existing home markets continues
Bill Haskell writes Can local governments make it a crime to sleep outside if no inside space is available?
Angry Bear writes The economy is actually doing great — unless you want to make a change in your life.
NewDealdemocrat writes Housing construction rebounds in February, as permits and starts are stable and rebounding
I’ve recently written a ‘top 10’ review of a new book on supportive housing—i.e., subsidized housing with social work support—for persons with serious mental health challenges. The book’s an anthology that was edited by three Ontario-based researchers.
A key questions that emerges in the book is: Should such housing be owned and operated by for-profit providers, or by non-profit providers? An advantage of non-profit ownership, in my opinion, is that a non-profit entity eventually owns the asset.
My full review can be found here.
Enjoy and share: