by Summary:
I regard Marx, Schumpeter, Fisher, Keynes, Kalecki and Goodwin as the major foundations of a non-equilibrium approach to economics. This lecture provides an overview of the first 4–including a non-orthodox interpretation of Marx that is bound to annoy Marxists but emphasizes his coherent analysis of the cyclical nature of capitalism
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
I regard Marx, Schumpeter, Fisher, Keynes, Kalecki and Goodwin as the major foundations of a non-equilibrium approach to economics. This lecture provides an overview of the first 4–including a non-orthodox interpretation of Marx that is bound to annoy Marxists but emphasizes his coherent analysis of the cyclical nature of capitalism
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
|