by Summary:
Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Monte Carlo simulation explained (student stuff)
Mike Norman writes Corporate buybacks
Mike Norman writes Month end settlements
Angry Bear writes Biden finalizes rule opening up Obamacare to DACA recipients
| Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral |
Yeh sure about as well as the French Aristocracy was motivated to understand physiocrats. Now a more interesting question might be what if the people held the debt in some way when there was an economic downturn. Might change the dynamics, yes?
Take the widespread "posture" by F-MSM (financial main stream media) on Michael Barr's capital rules Basel "endgame". The posture was "oooh he wants to crank up capital". ON THE INSIDE, Barr is just another lawyer. Knows not a whit about economics. And he's a crony for the banking industry FROM THE START. The posture was fake. The idea was to FIND OFFSETS to the new Basel capital requirements and play accordingly. BUT he ended up caving (like the spineless shill that he is) altogether on all fronts. What a mass media! Big names…wsj, FT, barrons marketwatch…..all bunk posturers.
Anyone have a link to the interview this is from?
When is the argument? Good clip