by Summary:
Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
| Banks Influence Politics Explained Viral |
Yeh sure about as well as the French Aristocracy was motivated to understand physiocrats. Now a more interesting question might be what if the people held the debt in some way when there was an economic downturn. Might change the dynamics, yes?
Take the widespread "posture" by F-MSM (financial main stream media) on Michael Barr's capital rules Basel "endgame". The posture was "oooh he wants to crank up capital". ON THE INSIDE, Barr is just another lawyer. Knows not a whit about economics. And he's a crony for the banking industry FROM THE START. The posture was fake. The idea was to FIND OFFSETS to the new Basel capital requirements and play accordingly. BUT he ended up caving (like the spineless shill that he is) altogether on all fronts. What a mass media! Big names…wsj, FT, barrons marketwatch…..all bunk posturers.
Anyone have a link to the interview this is from?
When is the argument? Good clip