by Summary:
The "Cobb-Douglas Production Function" dominates Neoclassical macroeconomic models today. Decades ago, Anwar Shaikh showed that it's "excellent fit to national data" occurred because it is simply a transformation of wage and profit data under conditions of a slowly changing distribution of income, while Mankiw showed that to fit international data, the coefficient for capital had to be increased from 0.3 to at least 0.8. My insight that "labour without energy is a corpse; capital without energy is a sculpture" shows that, when energy is included, the exponent for energy has to be about ten times the value Neoclassical economists use, and the best fit to the data comes from the Leontief Production Function that is used by Post Keynesian economists.
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
The "Cobb-Douglas Production Function" dominates Neoclassical macroeconomic models today. Decades ago, Anwar Shaikh showed that it's "excellent fit to national data" occurred because it is simply a transformation of wage and profit data under conditions of a slowly changing distribution of income, while Mankiw showed that to fit international data, the coefficient for capital had to be increased from 0.3 to at least 0.8. My insight that "labour without energy is a corpse; capital without energy is a sculpture" shows that, when energy is included, the exponent for energy has to be about ten times the value Neoclassical economists use, and the best fit to the data comes from the Leontief Production Function that is used by Post Keynesian economists.
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Bill Haskell writes From the Middle Out and Bottom Up
Joel Eissenberg writes The business model of modern universities
Bill Haskell writes The Economics of Killing Medicaid . . .
Angry Bear writes Healthcare in the United States
| The "Cobb-Douglas Production Function" dominates Neoclassical macroeconomic models today. Decades ago, Anwar Shaikh showed that it's "excellent fit to national data" occurred because it is simply a transformation of wage and profit data under conditions of a slowly changing distribution of income, while Mankiw showed that to fit international data, the coefficient for capital had to be increased from 0.3 to at least 0.8. My insight that "labour without energy is a corpse; capital without energy is a sculpture" shows that, when energy is included, the exponent for energy has to be about ten times the value Neoclassical economists use, and the best fit to the data comes from the Leontief Production Function that is used by Post Keynesian economists. |
I really like these lectures. Are these ideas developed in your previous books? Much of what you stated I find overlaps with Communist inclined thinkers like Cockshott. I understand you are more Capitalist inclined. I don't care much about labels, I would just like to know in detail how we as people can make society function.
Thanks. They are, but in a fragmented way. These lectures were a chance to bring them together, which I intend doing comprehensively in a book I hope to finish over the next 3-4 years entited "Principle of Political Economy and Ecology".
@ProfSteveKeen Looking forward to it.