Summary:
[bit.ly/dsia02f] Part F of lecture 2 on Descriptive Statistics: An Islamic Approach. Discusses how corruption rankings were created to shift blame for failure of capitalist development models to the poor countries, instead of the bad model. Explains how these rankings are counter-productive in terms increasing, rather than decreasing, corruption.
Topics:
Asad Zaman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
[bit.ly/dsia02f] Part F of lecture 2 on Descriptive Statistics: An Islamic Approach. Discusses how corruption rankings were created to shift blame for failure of capitalist development models to the poor countries, instead of the bad model. Explains how these rankings are counter-productive in terms increasing, rather than decreasing, corruption.
Topics:
Asad Zaman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
|