by Summary:
Thermodynamics 2.0 was the “bisociation of thermodynamics with other academic disciplines such as physics, biology, sociology, economics… It is about merging two cultures, not just bridging the gap.” I argue proper scientific methods should take economics over, not merge with what is currently there. I show macroeconomics doesn’t need microeconomics, illustrate modeling using the Minsky ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Thermodynamics 2.0 was the “bisociation of thermodynamics with other academic disciplines such as physics, biology, sociology, economics… It is about merging two cultures, not just bridging the gap.” I argue proper scientific methods should take economics over, not merge with what is currently there. I show macroeconomics doesn’t need microeconomics, illustrate modeling using the Minsky ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model
Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW
Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE
Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius
|