by Summary:
Thermodynamics 2.0 was the “bisociation of thermodynamics with other academic disciplines such as physics, biology, sociology, economics… It is about merging two cultures, not just bridging the gap.” I argue proper scientific methods should take economics over, not merge with what is currently there. I show macroeconomics doesn’t need microeconomics, illustrate modeling using the Minsky ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Thermodynamics 2.0 was the “bisociation of thermodynamics with other academic disciplines such as physics, biology, sociology, economics… It is about merging two cultures, not just bridging the gap.” I argue proper scientific methods should take economics over, not merge with what is currently there. I show macroeconomics doesn’t need microeconomics, illustrate modeling using the Minsky ...
Topics:
Steve Keen considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
|