by Summary:
"Well, because economics is not like physics. And what is the profound difference? If you look at the curricula of economics departments, [...] if you look at textbooks, if you look at mainstream articles published in 'Econometrica', in 'Journal of Political Economy' ... it's not obvious that economics is not like physics. You start with assumptions. You build theorems. You prove the theorems. You have lemmas. Then, usually, somebody, maybe not the same author, collects some data and tests empirically, econometricly mostly, the reduced forms of the equations that derive from the theorems ... Isn't that what physicists do? ... More or less. ... But the profound difference, allow me to say, between economics and physics, is that, in physics the phenomenon doesn't give a damn about our
Topics:
Yanis Varoufakis considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
"Well, because economics is not like physics. And what is the profound difference? If you look at the curricula of economics departments, [...] if you look at textbooks, if you look at mainstream articles published in 'Econometrica', in 'Journal of Political Economy' ... it's not obvious that economics is not like physics. You start with assumptions. You build theorems. You prove the theorems. You have lemmas. Then, usually, somebody, maybe not the same author, collects some data and tests empirically, econometricly mostly, the reduced forms of the equations that derive from the theorems ... Isn't that what physicists do? ... More or less. ... But the profound difference, allow me to say, between economics and physics, is that, in physics the phenomenon doesn't give a damn about our
Topics:
Yanis Varoufakis considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
John Quiggin writes The war to end war, still going on
New Economics Foundation writes Reclaiming our regions
New Economics Foundation writes New Economics Podcast: Why is the benefits system failing disabled people
Michael Hudson writes Jill Stein: Splitting the Pro-Imperial Vote
| "Well, because economics is not like physics. And what is the profound difference? If you look at the curricula of economics departments, [...] if you look at textbooks, if you look at mainstream articles published in 'Econometrica', in 'Journal of Political Economy' ... it's not obvious that economics is not like physics. You start with assumptions. You build theorems. You prove the theorems. You have lemmas. Then, usually, somebody, maybe not the same author, collects some data and tests empirically, econometricly mostly, the reduced forms of the equations that derive from the theorems ... Isn't that what physicists do? ... More or less. ... But the profound difference, allow me to say, between economics and physics, is that, in physics the phenomenon doesn't give a damn about our models of the phenomenon. So, a meteorologist doesn't have to worry that the weather may change its ways because he or she has made a particular prediction. Whereas in social science, whether it's sociology, economics, whatever. The phenomenon really cares about our theories about the phenomenon. Because, as theories have the capacity to alter our behavior in accordance to the theory. So you get, to put it in statistical terms, a plethora of false positives and false negatives." From: "Yanis Varoufakis: From an Economics without Capitalism to Markets without Capitalism | DiEM25" https://youtu.be/9aK4OztueuE |