by Summary:
Headline says it all really – it’s not exaggeration or spin on our part. For months, years even, we’ve been told that Trump is “the Siberian candidate”, or “Putin’s puppet” and “Russia’s Weapon”. The evidence was never supplied, but those who questioned the claim were mocked, derided and ignored. None of that matters now…because today, in the New York Times, these words were published:… no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted Russian money.” For proof, and just in case they take it down, here’s a screen cap: Right there in black-and-white. There are other words, of course, thousands of them, a quarter of a novel. But none of the others matter: filler and pulp and gossip and nonsense. What we’ve been
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Headline says it all really – it’s not exaggeration or spin on our part. For months, years even, we’ve been told that Trump is “the Siberian candidate”, or “Putin’s puppet” and “Russia’s Weapon”. The evidence was never supplied, but those who questioned the claim were mocked, derided and ignored. None of that matters now…because today, in the New York Times, these words were published:… no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted Russian money.” For proof, and just in case they take it down, here’s a screen cap: Right there in black-and-white. There are other words, of course, thousands of them, a quarter of a novel. But none of the others matter: filler and pulp and gossip and nonsense. What we’ve been
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Headline says it all really – it’s not exaggeration or spin on our part. For months, years even, we’ve been told that Trump is “the Siberian candidate”, or “Putin’s puppet” and “Russia’s Weapon”. The evidence was never supplied, but those who questioned the claim were mocked, derided and ignored.
None of that matters now…because today, in the New York Times, these words were published:…
no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted Russian money.”
For proof, and just in case they take it down, here’s a screen cap:
Right there in black-and-white. There are other words, of course, thousands of them, a quarter of a novel. But none of the others matter: filler and pulp and gossip and nonsense.
What we’ve been saying, all along, is finally an admitted fact in the mainstream media.
Moon of Alabama has done a good piece on this here.