Tuesday , November 5 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Brian Romanchuk — Liability Matching Versus Return Maximisation And Bonds

Brian Romanchuk — Liability Matching Versus Return Maximisation And Bonds

Summary:
Before we discuss investment strategies, we first need to decide what our ultimate objectives are. When we are investing, the two usual objectives is that we are either attempting to achieve maximum returns, or we are matching against liabilities, using a broad sense of liabilities. A boring non-levered bond portfolio is a reasonable choice for liability matching, but it is much harder to see how it fits within a pure returns maximisation view.... Bond Economics Liability Matching Versus Return Maximisation And BondsBrian Romanchuk

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:
Before we discuss investment strategies, we first need to decide what our ultimate objectives are. When we are investing, the two usual objectives is that we are either attempting to achieve maximum returns, or we are matching against liabilities, using a broad sense of liabilities. A boring non-levered bond portfolio is a reasonable choice for liability matching, but it is much harder to see how it fits within a pure returns maximisation view....
Bond Economics
Liability Matching Versus Return Maximisation And Bonds
Brian Romanchuk
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *