by Summary:
When I first read this, I dismissed it as maybe being a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I have just come across another site which says something similar, that the CIA hasn't been happy with Macron, except it added that Israel wasn't happy with him either. I put this up for discussion, Peter Koenig is normally very good. He wonders if the powers that be wanted him removed. Come to think of it – NATO. Wasn’t it Emmanuel Macron, who called a few weeks ago for an independent European army? That would make NATO obsolete – well, or would it? If taken by the letter, NATO has been obsolete for the last almost 30 years, but of course, nobody takes NATO by the letter. NATO is a killing force for the empire, and a huge trillion-dollar profit-making proposition for the US military industrial
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
When I first read this, I dismissed it as maybe being a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I have just come across another site which says something similar, that the CIA hasn't been happy with Macron, except it added that Israel wasn't happy with him either. I put this up for discussion, Peter Koenig is normally very good. He wonders if the powers that be wanted him removed.When I first read this, I dismissed it as maybe being a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I have just come across another site which says something similar, that the CIA hasn't been happy with Macron, except it added that Israel wasn't happy with him either. I put this up for discussion, Peter Koenig is normally very good. He wonders if the powers that be wanted him removed. Come to think of it – NATO. Wasn’t it Emmanuel Macron, who called a few weeks ago for an independent European army? That would make NATO obsolete – well, or would it? If taken by the letter, NATO has been obsolete for the last almost 30 years, but of course, nobody takes NATO by the letter. NATO is a killing force for the empire, and a huge trillion-dollar profit-making proposition for the US military industrial
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice
Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.
Come to think of it – NATO. Wasn’t it Emmanuel Macron, who called a few weeks ago for an independent European army? That would make NATO obsolete – well, or would it? If taken by the letter, NATO has been obsolete for the last almost 30 years, but of course, nobody takes NATO by the letter. NATO is a killing force for the empire, and a huge trillion-dollar profit-making proposition for the US military industrial complex.
So, when Macron called for a European army, he may have upset some very violent interest groups, those who literally make a killing from killing. He may have gone a step too far in his imaginary role as King Macron. There are bigger kings than he is. A European army would most likely be armed by European weapon manufacturers, mostly from France and Germany – and – god forbid – perhaps even Russia? – This would be logical, since Russia is really no enemy of Europe, as every politician in Europe knows, even if they don’t dare to admit it. Also, Russia’s arms, especially long-range ballistic systems and Russia’s S-400 Air Defense System, are far superior to the US variety. Hence, partnering with Russia would not be rocket science, though certainly less than appreciated by Washington.
Global Research