Summary:
Putin Is Soft. He Should Learn to Scare the West Like Khrushchev Did PCR has always said that Putin is too polite and this increases the risk of WW3. If Putin was more aggressive, says PCR, the West would back down. I'm not so sure, maybe Putin knows what he is doing as the West is crazy and run by criminals. Apparently, Putin was very upset about Gaddafi's brutal death and vowed never to let it happen to Assad. Putin might well just be a brilliant statesmen, but I've always detected an emphatic sensitivity when he talks. Politicians in the West are loud mouthed jerks, full of their hubris and self importance, but Putin is nothing like that. He's measured, reasonable, politely spoken, and intelligent. Paul Craig Roberts The article below by Gilbert Doctorow echos my own expressed
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Putin Is Soft. He Should Learn to Scare the West Like Khrushchev DidPutin Is Soft. He Should Learn to Scare the West Like Khrushchev Did PCR has always said that Putin is too polite and this increases the risk of WW3. If Putin was more aggressive, says PCR, the West would back down. I'm not so sure, maybe Putin knows what he is doing as the West is crazy and run by criminals. Apparently, Putin was very upset about Gaddafi's brutal death and vowed never to let it happen to Assad. Putin might well just be a brilliant statesmen, but I've always detected an emphatic sensitivity when he talks. Politicians in the West are loud mouthed jerks, full of their hubris and self importance, but Putin is nothing like that. He's measured, reasonable, politely spoken, and intelligent. Paul Craig Roberts The article below by Gilbert Doctorow echos my own expressed
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice
Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.
PCR has always said that Putin is too polite and this increases the risk of WW3. If Putin was more aggressive, says PCR, the West would back down. I'm not so sure, maybe Putin knows what he is doing as the West is crazy and run by criminals.
Apparently, Putin was very upset about Gaddafi's brutal death and vowed never to let it happen to Assad.
Putin might well just be a brilliant statesmen, but I've always detected an emphatic sensitivity when he talks. Politicians in the West are loud mouthed jerks, full of their hubris and self importance, but Putin is nothing like that. He's measured, reasonable, politely spoken, and intelligent.
Paul Craig Roberts
The article below by Gilbert Doctorow echos my own expressed apprehensions about Putin’s extraordinary restraint in the face of extraordinary provocations. I admire Putin for his restraint, which is totally missing among his Western counterparts. Nevertheless, I have expressed concern that the same restraint that is preventing war might be leading to war. Many historians of World War II concluded that it was British Prime Minister Chamberlain’s good intentions to defuse conflict situations rather than to put down a firm foot that encouraged Hitler to go too far.
Doctorow is certainly correct that no Western politician would have spoken to or about any Soviet leader as they do about Putin. The situation has reached the point of extreme recklessness with the UK government declaring that it is preparing for war with Russia. During the Soviet era no UK government would ever have declared anything so preposterously provocative. Russia can wipe the UK off the face of the earth in a few minutes, and the British defense minister declares that Britain is preparing for war against Russia!
Putin is an intelligent, polite, accommodating and reasonable leader, the like of which exists nowhere in the Western world. He is the only political leader anywhere who can stand before assembled and often hostile media for hours answering every question without evasion, notes, or aides whispering the answer into his ear. Putin deserves everyone’s respect. Instead, he is subjected, along with Russia, to an orchestrated demonization campaign. How does this promote peace? In our time of incomprehensibly powerful nuclear weapons, how can such irresponsible Western behavior be justified?
PCR