by Recently Brad DeLong has been flying his “neoliberal freak flag high” on his blog. And not that long ago Simon Wren-Lewis had a post up commenting on traction gaining “attacks on mainstream economics”: One frequent accusation … often repeated by heterodox economists, is that mainstream economics and neoliberal ideas are inextricably linked. Of course economics is used to support neoliberalism. Yet I find mainstream economics full of ideas and analysis that permits a wide ranging and deep critique of these same positions. The idea that the two live and die together is just silly. Hmm … Silly? Maybe. But maybe Wren-Lewis and other economists who want to enlighten themselves on the subject also should take a look at this video: [embedded content] Or maybe read this essay, where yours truly tries to further analyze — much inspired by the works of Amartya Sen — what kind of philosophical-ideological-political-economic doctrine neoliberalism is, and why it so often comes natural for mainstream economists to embrace neoliberal ideals. Or maybe, if you know some Swedish — and aren’t offended by shameless self-promotion — you could take a look in this book — The dismal science (Atlas 2001) — where I give a deeper analysis of different strands of neoliberalism and how they relate to economics.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Ekonomisk politik och finanspolitiska ramverk
Lars Pålsson Syll writes NAIRU — a harmful fairy tale
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Isabella Weber on sellers inflation
Recently Brad DeLong has been flying his “neoliberal freak flag high” on his blog. And not that long ago Simon Wren-Lewis had a post up commenting on traction gaining “attacks on mainstream economics”:
One frequent accusation … often repeated by heterodox economists, is that mainstream economics and neoliberal ideas are inextricably linked. Of course economics is used to support neoliberalism. Yet I find mainstream economics full of ideas and analysis that permits a wide ranging and deep critique of these same positions. The idea that the two live and die together is just silly.
Hmm …
Silly? Maybe. But maybe Wren-Lewis and other economists who want to enlighten themselves on the subject also should take a look at this video:
Or maybe read this essay, where yours truly tries to further analyze — much inspired by the works of Amartya Sen — what kind of philosophical-ideological-political-economic doctrine neoliberalism is, and why it so often comes natural for mainstream economists to embrace neoliberal ideals.
Or maybe, if you know some Swedish — and aren’t offended by shameless self-promotion — you could take a look in this book — The dismal science (Atlas 2001) — where I give a deeper analysis of different strands of neoliberalism and how they relate to economics.