by Summary:
According to the former envoy, Beijing's current policy has given China the “moral high ground” but the policy “'is not suitable […] unless China-US negotiations agree that neither side would use [nuclear weapons] first.”Mostly moot in that Russia, which is allied with China all but formally, has no such policy and it fact has the opposite policy, and Russia alone can actually destroy continental US with a single nuclear barrage of hypersonic missiles from it nuclear trident, against which the US has no defense.Sputnik InternationalChinese Diplomat Explains Why Beijing Should Scrap ‘No-First-Use’ of Nukes PolicyRelatedTASSChina castigates AUKUS alliance as pact violating nuclear non-proliferation
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
According to the former envoy, Beijing's current policy has given China the “moral high ground” but the policy “'is not suitable […] unless China-US negotiations agree that neither side would use [nuclear weapons] first.”Mostly moot in that Russia, which is allied with China all but formally, has no such policy and it fact has the opposite policy, and Russia alone can actually destroy continental US with a single nuclear barrage of hypersonic missiles from it nuclear trident, against which the US has no defense.Sputnik InternationalChinese Diplomat Explains Why Beijing Should Scrap ‘No-First-Use’ of Nukes PolicyRelatedTASSChina castigates AUKUS alliance as pact violating nuclear non-proliferation
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model
Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW
Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE
Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius
According to the former envoy, Beijing's current policy has given China the “moral high ground” but the policy “'is not suitable […] unless China-US negotiations agree that neither side would use [nuclear weapons] first.”Mostly moot in that Russia, which is allied with China all but formally, has no such policy and it fact has the opposite policy, and Russia alone can actually destroy continental US with a single nuclear barrage of hypersonic missiles from it nuclear trident, against which the US has no defense.
Sputnik International
Chinese Diplomat Explains Why Beijing Should Scrap ‘No-First-Use’ of Nukes Policy
Chinese Diplomat Explains Why Beijing Should Scrap ‘No-First-Use’ of Nukes Policy
Related
China castigates AUKUS alliance as pact violating nuclear non-proliferation