Initial claims move closer to red flag recession warning – by New Deal democrat Initial jobless claims declined -12,000 last week to 237,000. The four week average declined -6,750 to 246,750. With a one week delay, continuing claims increased 11,000 to 1,729,000: More importantly for forecasting purposes, the YoY% increases were 7.2% for the weekly number, 14.5% for the 4 week average, and 31.6% for continuing claims respectively: This is the 4th week in a row that the 4 week average has been higher YoY by more than 12.5%. If this continues for several more weeks, that would be sufficient to trigger a red flag recession warning from this series. Finally, since initial claims have a long-established history of leading the unemployment
Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important: politics, US EConomics
This could be interesting, too:
NewDealdemocrat writes Retail Real Sales
Angry Bear writes Planned Tariffs, An Economy Argument with Political Implications
Joel Eissenberg writes Will DOGE be an exercise in futility?
Bill Haskell writes The spider’s web called Healthcare Insurance
Initial claims move closer to red flag recession warning
– by New Deal democrat
Initial jobless claims declined -12,000 last week to 237,000. The four week average declined -6,750 to 246,750. With a one week delay, continuing claims increased 11,000 to 1,729,000:
More importantly for forecasting purposes, the YoY% increases were 7.2% for the weekly number, 14.5% for the 4 week average, and 31.6% for continuing claims respectively:
This is the 4th week in a row that the 4 week average has been higher YoY by more than 12.5%. If this continues for several more weeks, that would be sufficient to trigger a red flag recession warning from this series.
Finally, since initial claims have a long-established history of leading the unemployment rate, here is the comparison of YoY claims averaged monthly (blue) as well as the 4 week average, compared with the YoY% change in the unemployment rate (gold):
Note importantly that the graph above measures the change in the unemployment rate as a “percent of a percent,” so for example a 10% increase from 3.6% would be just below 4.0%. To trigger the Sahm rule, we would need a 0.5% increase in the actual rate from the 3-month average of the lowest unemployment rate in the past year. To put it plainly: for forecasting purposes, we’re not there yet. But since the Sahm rule tells us retroactively when we have started a recession, it doesn’t affect my own forecasting analysis.
Initial jobless claims: moving closer to a red flag warning, Angry Bear, New Deal democrat