This is an important article socially, politically and economically based on its implications. While there is a "digital divide" between analog people and digitally capable people, the more significant divide is between those that grew up in the transition to the digital age, with the introduction of mass computing in around 1980. The Apple II was introduced in 1977. The most significant digital divide generationally is between analog natives and digital natives. Now a further iteration is coming to light. The divide between smart technology natives and those previous to it. In this environment, analog natives are being left behind, even though they may be digitally capable but are not digitally native. It is a deep difference in culture. Something similar happened at the
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: digital age, generational change
This could be interesting, too:
Ken Melvin writes A Tale of Two Economies
Mike Norman writes Dee Hock — IS A SECOND HAND LIFE WORTH LIVING?
Mike Norman writes Zero Hedge — Fourth Turning’s Neil Howe: Why Millennials Aren’t So Unique
Mike Norman writes Michael Krieger — Americans are Rapidly Descending Into Madness
The Conversation
How the smartphone affected an entire generation of kids
Also
I agree about learning to code, along with reading, writing and 'rithmetic. It's a component of literacy in the digital age.
Ideally, children should also learn two languages from infancy. Presently, this only happens in bi-lingual households. The research is in, showing that the benefits are significant, and it should be introduced culturally as early as possible.
This is already happening in many countries where knowing more than one language is essential. Technology now makes this possible. For example, in bi-lingual households, often grandparents don't live near the children but talk to them daily via digital technology.
Futurism
A Computing Pioneer Says It’s Never Too Early to Teach Kids to Code
Karla Lant