by Summary:
I quite like the idea of a basic income although I admit there will be problems. On the good side it will free up time so that people will be able to pursue projects and careers that could turn out to be very productive and add value to the economy. On the other hand a lot of people might end being inactive and waste their lives which might make them even unhappy because people like having things to do. This is Ellen's Brown latest argument for the UBI. She even argues how the UBI could pay for itself by boosting economic activity and therefore taxes collected. The policy of guaranteeing every citizen a universal basic income is gaining support around the world, as automation increasingly makes jobs obsolete. But can it be funded without raising taxes or triggering hyperinflation? In a
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
I quite like the idea of a basic income although I admit there will be problems. On the good side it will free up time so that people will be able to pursue projects and careers that could turn out to be very productive and add value to the economy. On the other hand a lot of people might end being inactive and waste their lives which might make them even unhappy because people like having things to do. This is Ellen's Brown latest argument for the UBI. She even argues how the UBI could pay for itself by boosting economic activity and therefore taxes collected.I quite like the idea of a basic income although I admit there will be problems. On the good side it will free up time so that people will be able to pursue projects and careers that could turn out to be very productive and add value to the economy. On the other hand a lot of people might end being inactive and waste their lives which might make them even unhappy because people like having things to do. This is Ellen's Brown latest argument for the UBI. She even argues how the UBI could pay for itself by boosting economic activity and therefore taxes collected. The policy of guaranteeing every citizen a universal basic income is gaining support around the world, as automation increasingly makes jobs obsolete. But can it be funded without raising taxes or triggering hyperinflation? In a
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes How inequality causes financial crises
Robert Vienneau writes Intensive Rent With Two Types Of Land
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Oíche Chiúin, Stille Nacht, Silent Night
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The history of random walks
The policy of guaranteeing every citizen a universal basic income is gaining support around the world, as automation increasingly makes jobs obsolete. But can it be funded without raising taxes or triggering hyperinflation? In a panel I was on at the NexusEarth cryptocurrency conference in Aspen September 21-23rd, most participants said no. This is my rebuttal.
In May 2017, a team of researchers at the University of Oxford published the results of a survey of the world’s best artificial intelligence experts, who predicted that there was a 50 percent chance of AI outperforming humans in all tasks within 45 years. All human jobs were expected to be automated in 120 years, with Asian respondents expecting these dates much sooner than North Americans. In theory, that means we could all retire and enjoy the promised age of universal leisure. But the immediate concern for most people is that they will be losing their jobs to machines.
That helps explain the recent interest in a universal basic income (UBI) – a sum of money distributed equally to everyone. A UBI has been proposed in Switzerland, trials are beginning in Finland, and there is a successful pilot ongoing in Brazil. The cities of Ontario in Canada, Oakland in California, and Utrecht in the Netherlands are planning trials; two local authorities in Scotland have announced such plans; and politicians across Europe, including UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, have spoken in favor of the concept. Advocates in the US range from Robert Reich to Mark Zuckerberg, Martin Luther King, Thomas Paine, Charles Murray, Elon Musk, Dan Savage, Keith Ellison and Paul Samuelson. A new economic study found that a UBI of $1000/month to all adults would add $2.5 trillion to the US economy in eight years.
Welfare can encourage laziness, because benefits go down as earned income goes up. But studies have shown that a UBI distributed equally regardless of income does not have that result. In 1968, President Richard Nixon initiated a successful trial showing that the money had little impact on the recipients’ working hours. People who did reduce the time they worked engaged in other socially valuable pursuits, and young people who were not working spent more time getting an education. Analysis of a similar Canadian trial found that employment rates among young adults did not change, high-school completion rates increased, and hospitalization rates dropped by 8.5 percent. Larger experiments in India have reached similar results.
Studies have also shown that it would actually be cheaper to distribute funds to the entire population than to run the welfare services governments engage in now. It has been calculated that if the UK’s welfare budget were split among the country’s 50 million adults, each of them would get £5,160 a year.
But that is not enough to cover basic survival needs in a modern economy. Taxes would need to be raised, additional debt incurred, or other programs slashed; and these are solutions on which governments are generally unwilling to embark. The other option is “qualitative easing,” a form of central bank quantitative easing in which the money flows directly into the real economy rather than simply into banks. In Europe, politicians are taking another look at this once-derided “helicopter money.” A UBI is being proposed as monetary policy that would stimulate productivity without increasing taxes. As Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, former senior vice president of the World:
More here:
Ellen Brown: How to Fund a Universal Basic Income Without Increasing Taxes or Inflation