by Summary:
The US argues that US intervention in foreign elections to "promote democracy" is completely legitimate because "human rights.' Liberal interventionism good, all other interventionism bad. Liberal internationalism good, socialist internationalism bad. Hypocrisy based on double standards?Actually, it not about dominance of Western liberal values, but really about Western neoliberal economic dominance as the basis of transnational corporate totalitarianism supplanting democracy.NEOSanctions, Subversion, and Color Revolutions: US Meddling in Cambodian Elections Tony Cartalucci
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: US foreign interventionism
This could be interesting, too:
The US argues that US intervention in foreign elections to "promote democracy" is completely legitimate because "human rights.' Liberal interventionism good, all other interventionism bad. Liberal internationalism good, socialist internationalism bad. Hypocrisy based on double standards?Actually, it not about dominance of Western liberal values, but really about Western neoliberal economic dominance as the basis of transnational corporate totalitarianism supplanting democracy.NEOSanctions, Subversion, and Color Revolutions: US Meddling in Cambodian Elections Tony Cartalucci
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: US foreign interventionism
This could be interesting, too:
Liberal interventionism good, all other interventionism bad. Liberal internationalism good, socialist internationalism bad.
Hypocrisy based on double standards?
Actually, it not about dominance of Western liberal values, but really about Western neoliberal economic dominance as the basis of transnational corporate totalitarianism supplanting democracy.
NEO
Sanctions, Subversion, and Color Revolutions: US Meddling in Cambodian Elections
Tony Cartalucci