Thursday , May 9 2024
Home / Lars P. Syll / Involuntary unemployment — a Keynesian ‘impurity’

Involuntary unemployment — a Keynesian ‘impurity’

Summary:
Samuelson’s reconciliation of the micro-economic ideal type with involuntary unemployment was repudiated, along with Keynesian prescriptions, in favor of a view that there could be no involuntary unemployment , hence that government action was unnecessary. The result was a doctrinaire derivation of the laissez-faire conclusions that had been overturned by the formalist revolution; economics was now cleansed of Keynesian impurities that had been introduced in the interest of realism. Peter Boettke Advertisements

Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Pålsson Syll writes The total incompetence of people in charge of the US economy

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Ergodicity — a questionable assumption (wonkish)

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Vägval i finanspolitiken

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Economics — a dismal and harmful science

Involuntary unemployment — a Keynesian ‘impurity’Samuelson’s reconciliation of the micro-economic ideal type with involuntary unemployment was repudiated, along with Keynesian prescriptions, in favor of a view that there could be no involuntary unemployment , hence that government action was unnecessary. The result was a doctrinaire derivation of the laissez-faire conclusions that had been overturned by the formalist revolution; economics was now cleansed of Keynesian impurities that had been introduced in the interest of realism.

Peter Boettke

Advertisements
Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *