by Summary:
Interesting stuff from the One Handed Economist From Intellectual to influencer: “In the case of the public intellectual, the institution was the academy and the role was thinking. In the case of the public influencer, the institution is the corporation and the role is marketing. The shift makes sense. Marketing, after all, has displaced thinking as our primary culture-shaping activity, the source of what we perceive ourselves to be.” How true does this seem?
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: history, Journalism, politics
This could be interesting, too:
Interesting stuff from the One Handed Economist From Intellectual to influencer: “In the case of the public intellectual, the institution was the academy and the role was thinking. In the case of the public influencer, the institution is the corporation and the role is marketing. The shift makes sense. Marketing, after all, has displaced thinking as our primary culture-shaping activity, the source of what we perceive ourselves to be.” How true does this seem?
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: history, Journalism, politics
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Biden finalizes rule opening up Obamacare to DACA recipients
Bill Haskell writes Commercial or Charter Flights to BBall Games
Eric Kramer writes Ukraine, Israel, and Biden: lessons and questions
Bill Haskell writes A Teaser for you . . . Trickle Down Economics
Interesting stuff from the One Handed Economist
From Intellectual to influencer: “In the case of the public intellectual, the institution was the academy and the role was thinking. In the case of the public influencer, the institution is the corporation and the role is marketing. The shift makes sense. Marketing, after all, has displaced thinking as our primary culture-shaping activity, the source of what we perceive ourselves to be.”
How true does this seem?