Chicago style history of economics Dans son histoire de la macroéconomie, De Vroey (2015) donne le premier rôle aux transformations épistémologiques et méthodologiques défendues par la NEC [nouvelle économie classique], et plus particulièrement par Robert Lucas. Les macroéconomistes aujourd’hui reconnaissent en général cette dimension principale de la NEC … Si les bouleversements qu’a connu la macroéconomie sous l’impulsion de la NEC dans les années 1970...
Read More »Adorno’s ‘Aspects of the New Right-Wing Radicalism’
.[embedded content]
Read More »Feynman technique
.[embedded content] Yours truly has been teaching at different universities for more than forty years. Again and again I’ve learned one thing for sure. Feynman’s technique works!
Read More »The stability problem in Sraffian economic
The stability problem in Sraffian economic There is little doubt that the structure of the Sraffian system is identical to GET [General Equilibrium Theory] in its commitment to the algebra of simultaneous equations but with this difference: the equations in GET are demand and supply equations, whereas the equations in Sraffian economics are physical input-output relations, which are supposed to determine prices independently of demand. The existence...
Read More »DSGE models — worse than useless
DSGE models — worse than useless Mainstream macroeconomics can only progress if it gets rid of the DSGE albatross around its neck. It is better to do it now than to wait for another 20 years because the question is not whether but when DSGE modeling will be discarded. DSGE modeling is a story of a death foretold … Getting rid of DSGE models is critical because the hegemonic DSGE program is crowding out alternative macro methodologies that do work … DSGE...
Read More »Bayesianism — a patently absurd approach to science
Bayesianism — a patently absurd approach to science Mainstream economics nowadays usually assumes that agents that have to make choices under conditions of uncertainty behave according to Bayesian rules (preferably the ones axiomatised by Ramsey (1931), de Finetti (1937) or Savage (1954)) — that is, they maximise expected utility with respect to some subjective probability measure that is continually updated according to Bayes theorem. If not, they are...
Read More »Wie Statistiken manipuliert werden
Wie Statistiken manipuliert werden .[embedded content]
Read More »Kränkthetspladder vid Malmö universitet
Kränkthetspladder vid Malmö universitet Det handlar om en gästföreläsning på masterprogrammet i sexologi vid Malmö universitet … Gästföreläsaren visade rasistiska nidbilder, som så kallade blackfaces och yellowfaces, och använde flera gånger n-ordet. Till saken hör att ordet och nidbilderna var en del av en medveten pedagogisk strategi. Eller som tre ansvariga vid universitetet skrev i ett svar på en insändare i Sydsvenskan den 24 februari: ”Avsikten med...
Read More »Ten years jubilee
Tired of the idea of an infallible mainstream economics and its perpetuation of spoon-fed orthodoxy, yours truly launched this blog in March 2011. The number of visitors has increased steadily, and now, ten years later and with millions of page views, I have to admit of still being — given the rather wonkish character of the blog, with posts mostly on economic theory, statistics, econometrics, theory of science and methodology — rather gobsmacked that so many are interested...
Read More »Neo-Ricardian economics — rigorous and totally irrelevant
Neo-Ricardian economics — rigorous and totally irrelevant I claim that Sraffian economics, however rigorous in its use of the simultaneous equations method … is irrelevant to our understanding of the real world and, judging by its failure to draw any policy implications, is largely irrelevant to the major concerns of modern economists … This is not a judgment based simply on my opinion, which is ultimately no better than yours. Relevance is not a matter for...
Read More »