Sunday , March 9 2025
Home / Lars P. Syll (page 523)
Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Lars P. Syll

Why non-existence of uncertainty is such a monstrously absurd assumption

Why non-existence of uncertainty is such a monstrously absurd assumption All these pretty, polite techniques, made for a well-panelled Board Room and a nicely regulated market, are liable to collapse. At all times the vague panic fears and equally vague and unreasoned hopes are not really lulled, and lie but a little way below the surface. Perhaps the reader feels that this general, philosophical disquisition on the behavior of mankind is somewhat remote from the economic theory under...

Read More »

Did Keynes ‘accept’ the IS-LM model?

Did Keynes ‘accept’ the IS-LM model? Lord Keynes has some interesting references and links for those wanting to dwell upon the question if Keynes really “accepted” Hicks’s IS-LM model. My own view is that  IS-LM doesn’t adequately reflect the width and depth of Keynes’s insights on the workings of modern market economies: 1  Almost nothing in the post-General Theory writings of Keynes suggests him considering Hicks’s IS-LM anywhere near a faithful rendering of his thought. In Keynes’s...

Read More »

Lauritz Weibull och den källkritiska Lundamyten

Lauritz Weibull och den källkritiska Lundamyten “Kritiska undersökningar i Weibull-mytens historia” … är på en gång en stridsskrift, en detetektivbragd och ett stycke – föga uppbygglig – lärdomshistoria. Arvidssons-Aarsleffs teori om weibullianismens härstamning är långt mer plausibel än L W:s egen redogörelse, och den är oändligt mycket mer plausibel än den självmotsägande advokatyr hans väpnare presterat. Arvidsson och Aarsleff argumenterar elegant och stringent för sin tes, men...

Read More »

Bayesianism — a scientific cul-de-sac

Bayesianism — a scientific cul-de-sac One of my favourite “problem situating lecture arguments” against Bayesianism goes something like this: Assume you’re a Bayesian turkey and hold a nonzero probability belief in the hypothesis H that “people are nice vegetarians that do not eat turkeys and that every day I see the sun rise confirms my belief.” For every day you survive, you update your belief according to Bayes’ Rule P(H|e) = [P(e|H)P(H)]/P(e), where evidence e stands for “not being...

Read More »

Econometric delusions

Because I was there when the economics department of my university got an IBM 360, I was very much caught up in the excitement of combining powerful computers with economic research. Unfortunately, I lost interest in econometrics almost as soon as I understood how it was done. My thinking went through four stages: 1.Holy shit! Do you see what you can do with a computer’s help. 2.Learning computer modeling puts you in a small class where only other members of the caste can truly...

Read More »