Summary:
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, […]
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Paul Krugman — finally — admits he was wrong!
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Paul Krugman — finally — admits he was wrong!
Dan Crawford writes Open Thread March 28, 2023
John Quiggin writes The meta-view from meta-nowhere