Summary:
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, […]
Oreiro and de Paula’s (2022) reply to my article (Palley, 2021) further convinces me that New Developmentalism (ND) substantially misconstrues the development challenge and ND’s policy recommendations lean in a Neoliberal direction. The critique of ND is not its emphasis of the importance of manufacturing. It is the regressive inclination, the narrowness of policy recommendations, ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
John Quiggin writes The era of privatisation is nearly over. But cleaning up the mess left behind will take years
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Job creation
Editor writes Why do domestic food prices keep going up when global prices fall?
Eric Kramer writes Patriotism and the Harris campaign