Summary:
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences […]
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Asad Zaman writes Breaking boundaries in economics: Rediscovering the roots of welfare
Maria Alejandra Madi writes Pathways to sustainability (1)
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Det bidde en tummetott — det nya finanspolitiska ramverket
Merijn T. Knibbe writes How to deal with inflation?