Summary:
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences […]
Keynes’ General Theory was a massive step forward relative to classical economics, but it was also a step backward in its denial of the conflictual nature of capitalism. There is need to understand Keynes’ technical contributions regarding the workings of monetary economies, but also need to understand the flaws within his thinking and the consequences ...
Topics:
tom considers the following as important: Economics, Political Economy, Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Peter Radford writes Weekend read – The trouble with words
Dean Baker writes In a free market, drugs are cheap, government-granted patent monopolies make them expensive
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Angus Deaton rethinking economics
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Ideology and the politics of economic method