Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / Lars P. Syll / Top 10 RCT critiques

Top 10 RCT critiques

Summary:
Top 10 RCT critiques •Basu, Kaushik (2014) Randomisation, Causality and the Role of Reasoned Intuition •Cartwright, Nancy  (2010) What are randomised controlled trials good for? •Cartwright, Nancy & Hardie, Jeremy (2012) Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better •Deaton, Angus (2009 ) Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development •Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy (2016) Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials •Freedman, David (2006) Statistical models for causation: what inferential leverage do they provide? •Heckman, James & Urzua, Sergio (2009) Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify •Leamer, Edward

Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Kausalitet — en crash course

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Randomization and causal claims

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Race and sex as causes

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Randomization — a philosophical device gone astray

Top 10 RCT critiques

Top 10 RCT critiques

•Basu, Kaushik (2014) Randomisation, Causality and the Role of Reasoned Intuition

Advertisements
Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *