by Chomsky’s critique of postmodernism .[embedded content] One of Chomsky’s primary critiques of postmodernism lies in its epistemological stance. Chomsky argues that postmodern scepticism about objective knowledge can undermine the pursuit of scientific inquiry, which relies on the assumption that there are objective truths waiting to be discovered. Chomsky’s criticisms are forceful reminders of the pitfalls of extreme relativism and scepticism, and yours truly basically shares Chomsky’s criticism. Postmodern thinkers have nothing essentially new to convey. Their central ideas are often not explained. And — they present their thoughts in completely unaccessible linguistic jargon.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Politics & Society
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Germany’s ‘debt brake’ — a ridiculously bad idea
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Die hinkende Logik hinter der Schuldenbremse
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Being a class mongrel
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Riksbankens oansvariga penningpolitik
Chomsky’s critique of postmodernism
.
One of Chomsky’s primary critiques of postmodernism lies in its epistemological stance. Chomsky argues that postmodern scepticism about objective knowledge can undermine the pursuit of scientific inquiry, which relies on the assumption that there are objective truths waiting to be discovered.
Chomsky’s criticisms are forceful reminders of the pitfalls of extreme relativism and scepticism, and yours truly basically shares Chomsky’s criticism. Postmodern thinkers have nothing essentially new to convey. Their central ideas are often not explained. And — they present their thoughts in completely unaccessible linguistic jargon.