by Chomsky’s critique of postmodernism .[embedded content] One of Chomsky’s primary critiques of postmodernism lies in its epistemological stance. Chomsky argues that postmodern scepticism about objective knowledge can undermine the pursuit of scientific inquiry, which relies on the assumption that there are objective truths waiting to be discovered. Chomsky’s criticisms are forceful reminders of the pitfalls of extreme relativism and scepticism, and yours truly basically shares Chomsky’s criticism. Postmodern thinkers have nothing essentially new to convey. Their central ideas are often not explained. And — they present their thoughts in completely unaccessible linguistic jargon.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Politics & Society
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Susan Neiman on why left is not woke
Lars Pålsson Syll writes ‘These brothers and sisters of mine’
Lars Pålsson Syll writes What we do in life echoes in eternity
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The man who never wavered — Alan Bates
Chomsky’s critique of postmodernism
.
One of Chomsky’s primary critiques of postmodernism lies in its epistemological stance. Chomsky argues that postmodern scepticism about objective knowledge can undermine the pursuit of scientific inquiry, which relies on the assumption that there are objective truths waiting to be discovered.
Chomsky’s criticisms are forceful reminders of the pitfalls of extreme relativism and scepticism, and yours truly basically shares Chomsky’s criticism. Postmodern thinkers have nothing essentially new to convey. Their central ideas are often not explained. And — they present their thoughts in completely unaccessible linguistic jargon.